How we impeached Bill Clinton for being a cheater, but have not even considered it for George Bush's treason?
What's up with that?
2007-06-08 04:43:40 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
That's fine and dandy karma, but in all reality a cheater and a liar are the same thing.
2007-06-08 04:53:15 · update #1
Isn't it funny...
That the Dems just can't research facts, and instead keep bringing up the same old rhetoric?
Again, for the 100th time, Clinton was not impeached because he was a womanizer. Hell, JFK wins the trophy for that title and no one even considered it. He was impeached because he lied under oath.
2007-06-08 04:48:29 · answer #1 · answered by Karma 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Clinton lied under oath, not for being a cheater and President Bush hasn't committed one single impeachable offense, let alone treason. That's what's up with that.
2007-06-08 12:17:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They all lie. There are investigations underway for both VP and P to be impeached. Bush lied to Congress in order to start an unjustified war. A war with a power that held the Taliban and Iran at bay. Now we see the result of why Daddy Bush didn't take out Saddam.
Anyway, enough bickering. The Democrats voted away their war powers to Bush. Pelosi said, (paraphrasing here) "We didn't know he was going to abuse the power."
Yeah. Uh huh. I learned in 3rd grade that there are 3 branches of government designed to balance power. Though there was precedent, it need not have been done.
We should impeach all of Congress, the Senate and the Executive for not defending the Constitution. An oath they swore when taking office. Call it what you want, but that document that is designed to protect us from our servants(elected officials) is constantly under attack regardless of who is in power. And that should be defined as treasonous.
2007-06-08 12:02:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
With both houses controlled by the Dems if there was a reason to impeach they would impeach
There is no reasons or facts to support impeachment so
Your wrong about the President being treasonous
Try again at hate mongering against America this ploy didn't work
2007-06-08 11:50:27 · answer #4 · answered by BUILD THE WALL 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Name a treasonous crime commited by our President. And I mean one that can be tried and convicted.
There isn't one. President Bush has not done anything wrong that's why. Unlike forment President Clinton, who lied under oath. Which is impeachment offense.
2007-06-08 11:50:31 · answer #5 · answered by mustagme 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Karma is completely right. Clinton lied under oath. Bush has not done anything against our country. He went with information that the military gave him. What the heck else is he supposed to go on?
2007-06-08 11:54:12 · answer #6 · answered by designmm 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Well, I would argue that Clinton also committed treason, in that he also expanded the powers of the Executive branch beyond the intent of the Constitution...but the power elites in both parties do not want to change that course.
We are stuck with a road to fascism until we take our country back from the elitists in both parties.
Ron Paul 2008
2007-06-08 11:49:23 · answer #7 · answered by Layne B 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
We do not have the 2/3 majority vote for charges to be brought.
2007-06-08 11:54:14 · answer #8 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Republicans have a different set of rules that they go by. President Clinton's indiscretions were embarrassing as you can well understand but it in no way affected the nation as President Bush's actions on bringing this country to its' knees. But hang in there. It ain't over till the fat lady sings.
2007-06-08 11:50:23 · answer #9 · answered by dVille 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
TREASON???!!!!....LOL....YOU ARE A RETARD
2007-06-08 11:51:25 · answer #10 · answered by tattooedscooterdude 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋