I think Bush 41 & 43 have intensified the competition between left and right in this country. At times it seems like 43 wants to reverse all the progress made in the 20th century, with respect to labor reforms and social programs. When you hang with the "Old Money" crowd, you hear a lot about how the robber barons should have been allowed to exploit workers, how the income tax was a violation of their rights, and how FDR was a Communist. During WWII, grampa Prescott Bush was found guilty of selling arms to Nazi Germany, so they have their own beef with FDR. The Bushes themselves are not "Old Money," of course, but they've bought their way into those circles with the infuence of the presidency. Now they're trying to prove they belong in that crowd, by rolling back the clock of progress for their rich friends. Like uneducated hicks who strike oil and move to Beverly Hills, or Kennebunkport, they have become status climbers.
Clearly the criticism aimed at the Bushes over the years has aggravated their response to many of these issues - they're overly sensitive to criticism. The guy who published a book about Dubya's drug-dealing died violently soon after the book was relased.
2007-06-08 03:53:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Who Else? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it extremely is in all probability genuine that maximum of them artwork extra durable than the regular american. whether or no longer they derserve to make 4 hundred to seven hundred or much extra situations what the regular worker makes is very arguable. because of the fact the 1980's govt pay has skyrocketed mutually as regular pay has no longer often budged. there are dissimilar motives for this, repayment cosultants are paid by potential of the companies and employed by potential of ideal administration, maximum board participants are executives of alternative companies, inappropraite benchmarking, backdating inventory innovations, restcted inventory and so on. and so on. frequently could say that their pay is far out of whack at this element, a great form of them get will improve and bonuses regardless of overall performance, get huge payoffs for doing mergers i could desire to circulate on and on. they do no longer constantly artwork smarter as some human beings have reported. i could desire to circulate into so plenty extra element in this, I worked in HR and company repayment. the lady who wrote the object interior the hyperlink is an authority in this you may desire to inspect her columns on the subject count. playstation conservatives could desire to save in mind brothers element -- if further and extra wealth gets centred interior the palms of fewer and much less human beings the threat of genuine socialism grows proportionately. a colourful center classification with genuine threat to have a respectable known of residing is what has made this usa great. the middle classification has been getting squeezed here interior the U. S.. i'm no longer saying maximum human beings don't have it tremendously solid here, however the present style isn't solid.
2016-10-09 11:53:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they just do not know any average Americans. They run in a much richer circle.
2007-06-08 03:47:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't say despise.
To despise someone takes the effort of actually thinking about them.
I would say "doesn't give a rat's a**."
2007-06-08 03:36:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Did you have to go to "Bonehead School" to be able make up a question that presumes so much about things you are totally clueless about?
2007-06-08 03:36:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by open4one 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
No,but I would have to say they probably despise you.
2007-06-08 03:37:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wize Guy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
In their parlance, we're know as "suckers."
2007-06-08 03:49:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, you are naive at best. Thanks for asking.
2007-06-08 03:40:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scott B 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
huh?????????
2007-06-08 03:37:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Adam of the wired 7
·
1⤊
1⤋