Oh Yeah! Most defiantly :)
2007-06-08 03:18:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by LuvMyKids 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. I think you should sue them for allowing so many people on here that have no common sense.
2007-06-08 03:27:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by My world 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You resemble someone i know. BTW, don't sue Yahoo. The cats with no sense of humor are the funniest b/c they take everything so seriously.
2007-06-08 03:18:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sweet! We could all join you in a class action and we could each get a check for 1/2 cent. The lawyers will get significantly more because they do all the hard work, such as filing and having meetings over lunch and, ah, talking on the phone......
2007-06-08 03:20:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by remowlms 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. suspended and/or cancelled accounts, whining little p*ssies, lots of folks wanting to hide from the truth, and censorship. I guess all of us in here had to give up our rights to free speech joining this communist forum. Before anyone takes offense to that statement. Read the definition of communism and then read the agreement you have to agree with before using Yahoo!Answers. It is communist at best, and immoral at worst. Possinly illegal. File the suit as I want some of the class action money too!
2007-06-08 03:23:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Think about it the current TV networks would be more at risk based on their lack of humor and drama on the majority of stations every night.
2007-06-08 03:23:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
In U.S. law, another aspect of federal jurisdiction is the extent of federal legislative power. Under the Constitution, Congress has power to legislate only in the areas that are delegated to it. Under clause 17 of Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, however, Congress has power to "exercise exclusive Legislation in all cases whatsoever" over the federal district and other territory ceded to the federal government by the states, such as for military installations. Federal jurisdiction is said to exist over such territory.
Federal jurisdiction in this sense is important in criminal law because federal law, being based on a concept of enumerated powers, does not deal with crimes as comprehensively as the laws of any state. To fill in any potential gaps, Congress has enacted the Assimilative Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 13), which provides that any act that would have been a crime under the laws of the state in which a federal enclave is situated is also a federal crime. In U.S. military law, it is often vitally important to establish whether the federal government had proprietary jurisdiction (only the rights of any other landowner), concurrent jurisdiction (the right to legislate concurrently with the state government), or exclusive jurisdiction over the land where an act was committed in order to establish court-martial jurisdiction over the actor.
WHAT THE HELL DID I JUST WRITE?? =P
hehehe
2007-06-08 03:25:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
You seem to be forgetting your First Amendment Rights. This allows the freedom of speech. People are allowed to have differing opinions. People are allowed to express these opinions.
Just remember that opinions are like noses.... everyone has one. Take their responses with a grain of salt and move on. Not everyone will always agree with you.
2007-06-08 03:22:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by DEREK E 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, but you should sue their ISPs for allowing them on the Internet in the first place.
2007-06-08 03:18:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by wdardingjr 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
FInally!!! Someone who has a sense of humor!! Thank god!! Can you believe I got a violation for talking about midgets?? All I said is that they are fun to watch and people threw a fit!!
2007-06-08 03:18:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by BT 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
I'm gonna sue you and take some of those 13,000 points Sway. LOL. You are cute and funny.
2007-06-08 03:30:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by The man 7
·
2⤊
0⤋