Just like recoiling of a gun.
If your hands are rigid,the impact will cause pain or may even injure your hands
2007-06-08 04:55:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by karikalan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure, if the ball lands interior the cap by technique of accident, and into the fielder's hand, devoid of hitting the floor. The ball ought to end interior the fielder's hand to be a capture. The fielder will possibly no longer use something to help the capture, different than the wicket keeper, who could use gloves. The ball would not inevitably ought to pass quickly into the fielder's hand. it may leap up off his foot into his hand (like Mike Gatting's capture in an early 90s Ashes sequence in Australia, off his very own ft) The ball could be caught off the batsman's head. If the batsman is wearing a helmet, this could nicely be a capture (yet no longer a capture if he's wearing a cap, or no headwear in any respect.) If the ball stopped lifeless interior the cap, then the umpire ought to declare the ball lifeless, as he could if that's going to become trapped in a pad.
2016-12-12 15:03:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all all the catches are taken the way you have described. However, when catching the balls coming down from the air, fielderstake their hands backward,so that the chances of ball spilling out of the hand and also injury to the fingers with the impact of the ball will be much less.
2007-06-08 04:54:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because catching the ball by going towards the direction of travellling of the ball will prevent the ball from popping out from the hands & Reduce the pain on hands due to catching.
2007-06-08 06:59:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dinesh 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.By moving your hands with the momentum of the ball you are creating a cushioning effect on the ball and taking the forward force out of the ball which makes it alot easier for the ball to stick in your hand,rather than going to the ball or staying in a rigid position which creates a hard impact surface which makes it more likely to drop the ball as the force of the ball bounces off your hands.
2.doesn't hurt your hands as much
3.less chance of injuring your hands or breaking a finger if you are going with the flow of the ball.
2007-06-08 02:52:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by FORKY 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everyone used to catch the ball the usual way which you would naturally catch. But the Australians developed this method of catching and due to their sucess in cricket a lot of others have followed suit.
2007-06-08 02:31:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Xander 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
To absorb the force of the ball in their hands and prevent it from bouncing out.
2007-06-09 04:07:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Santosh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they do this because the ball has momentum and it falls with a force and as you know every action has an equal and opposite reaction. That is why it is so.
2007-06-08 02:40:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would think that because if the ball were to pop back out of the glove, they would have a better chance of re-catching it.
2007-06-08 02:19:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by mw451 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
the cricket ball is very hard they do that so that the impact of the ball doesn't hurt their hands.
2007-06-08 20:50:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋