What do you mean buy the BOOK?
It wont be enough to fill a column in a newspaper!
2007-06-08 02:43:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Welshchick 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I don't doubt it; and what makes it even more laughable is that the News channels and papers will be gouging each others eyes out to get it first. Ergo - even more money rolling into the Hilton coffers. If she had a shred of morality the money would be donated to charity. Will it? Will it thump. Whilst her sad little antics no longer amaze me, the actions of the Court do. Has the blindfold on the statue of justice slipped? I know she's reportedly to be returned to jail, but why in God's name was she allowed out in the first place?
2007-06-08 03:45:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That would be right. She spends time in prison, does a book and becomes a billionaire. Does she need anymore money. I think not. But I know one thing I won't be buying her book when she comes out with it. Whether she is rich and famous or not, she should do her time just like anyone else in the world. She did the crime, now let her pay for it.
2007-06-08 01:50:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by hugabye 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Day 1 in Jail
They took my hair extensions away and there's no room service, how do people cope.
Day 2 in Jail
I've broken a nail and left my nail file in my Dior handbag
Day 3 in Jail
This is unbearable I have not bought anything for 3 days and my fake tan has started to streak. I've got Daddy to ring a nice man called Bush and I'm going home.
It was hell!
2007-06-08 02:09:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mrs M 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
40 5 days isn't long sufficient to earnings the thank you to write down. by the way, is Paris Hilton like Alicia Silverstone's character in Clueless yet bit without the seems, appeal, grace, wit, compassion, practise...
2016-10-09 11:45:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by maudlin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paris Hilton is a loser. She is NOT news worthy and definitely NOT good role model and yes she should just disappear. The world would be better off without "celebrity" losers like this.
2007-06-08 05:48:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, she should not have gotten jail time in the first place, because most likely the average citizen would not have gotten jail time in the same circumstance. However, since the judge apparently determined that her disregard of the law, violation of probation, and disrespect to the court merited some jail time, then I think once she was in there she should have served her time. I don't think the average person would have been let out like she was.
Apparently, under normal circumstances a psychological issue would have been handled by an application filed with the court and copied to the prosecutor, and that was not done. Some kind of squirrelly deal was cut.
2007-06-08 02:03:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Disgusting.
2007-06-11 23:43:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Suzie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I completely agree with you.
Totally.
Good point and well made.
By the same token, will you be buying the book if Gerry decides to publish one?
2007-06-08 06:28:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by dteacher1uk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Old news my friend. Read the Yahoo! Home Page. She is going back to jail because of a court order!
2007-06-08 01:52:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Desert Bird 5
·
2⤊
1⤋