Marriage has been in our culture for 1000's of years. Even our "GODS" were married. There are millions of people who like to stay single and they do too.
Marriages are in trouble cuz most people donot want to dedicate, sacrifice and respect their lives to marriage.
Divorce is an option to come out of a abused marriage but most people use it as an alibi cuz they don't really know what marriage is all about.
Good Luck.
2007-06-14 22:30:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by feysunny 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think marriages are not meant 4 humans because I think people should be together but not be joined by law. I would say 99% of marriages in the United States are in trouble or failing. Marriage isn't 4 humans.
2007-06-15 07:11:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ms. Sam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What an exciting array of solutions your question won! As many have suggested right here, marriage got here approximately earlier the christian bible, so it may be incorrect to declare that the church institued marriage, yet on the different hand, the church has had a extensive impression on the definition and standards of marriage. nevertheless marriage is a human invention and consistent with statistical counsel, it fails extra in many circumstances than it fairly works. i assume the genuine question is that if determining on a companion to mate with for existence is a organic human condition. In nature there are some species that do exactly that, yet there are a number of extra that do no longer. i could could end that it is not a organic state for human beings. all of us decide to have confidence that there is genuine love and that distinctive somebody interior the international we are meant to be with. The divorce fee is one indicator that it is not organic, yet in addition evaluate the style of marriages that did no longer divorce yet had infidelity take place. If it have been "organic" then we does no longer additionally be tempted to mate with yet another as quickly as we married. With that pronounced, I do have confidence in marriage and monogamy, I do exactly no longer think of it fairly is "organic". fairly it fairly is a call we make and and not an impossible existence-style to have.
2016-11-07 22:52:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Marriage is as natural as culture is natural. Yes, it is 'man-made' but to say that something man-made is unnatural is as ludicrous as saying that man is not an animal!
Perhaps the real question should be, "Is marriage necessary in our culture? What is the purpose of marriage? Why not co-habit?" As for monogamy, that is not a product of marriage. Other species have monogamous relationships, but why? Is monogamy the same thing as marriage? I don't think so.
2007-06-08 01:49:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Modern marriage is natural as many people want to have and stick with one partner. In nature the equivalent happens without the formality, e.g. swans mate for life. It must be seen as a preference to enter into only after proper consideration; marriage problems often occur because people do not think about the commitement they are making.
2007-06-15 01:23:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it's not.
Like many things the church wishes to impose on people, marriage is one of the things that goes against human nature.
It's no wonder many marriages end in divorce.
Christianity & religion in general chips away at the human condition until there is nothing more but a pitiful shadow of a human being.
To become a slave to supserstation is to become a broken spirit, a domesticated animal.
2007-06-08 01:51:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by psycho_majic_666 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Marriage is a legal contract. When we choose a mate, we become bound by children, money and real estate.
Our lives are more complicated than animals or prehistoric man.
What IS natural is the desire to commit and bond with someone long term.
2007-06-14 12:10:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Equinoxical ™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Men only had multiple women because they used muscle to get them. That's not really a natural state either.
A approximate natural state would be two (or a few more) people with a primary relationship, having kids together - BUT with both free to have shorter-term flings with others, without recriminations.
In reality, this is what actually happens, but everyone acts as though it's a terrible crime, and 'cheating', and so on.
The fact is, we're built that way: not exclusively monogamous. Our bodies show it: truly monogamous animals have tiny testicles, because that's all they need. Everything about our physiology and instincts shows we're not like that.
CD
2007-06-08 01:41:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Marriage is primarily an economic contract designed to control the ownership of the resources of production and financial resources within society as well as being a fundamental tool of social control.
After all, it is a wise man who knows his father refers to the fact that, prior to DNA testing, the only parent one could be absolutely certain was really a biological parent was the mother (one reason why the Jewish people follow the female line to determine lineage, rather than the father's).
Marriage, until relatively recently, was more of a business contract (dowries and bride prices) often negotiated to strengthen the economic base of families rather than have any regard for the welfare or happiness of the wedded couple. Even where polygamy did not exist, it was considered quite normal for powerful males to have a wife, but also to have concubines or mistresses outside the marriage bed. Bastard children were a valuable commodity, as they could be more trusted due to family loyalty and often filled important offices in an estate (Shire Reeve, Constable, Bailiff etc). William the Conqueror was a bastard son (his mother was a tanner).
Marriage is not natural at all.
2007-06-08 01:45:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nodality 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Based on my own observations I can't say marriage seems natural to me, but it does take communication,dedication, and effort from both partners involved.
2007-06-08 01:42:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mike M. 7
·
1⤊
0⤋