Are Pitt and Jolie adopting again?Should there be a limit until marriage and/or the ones she has are older?

Question

I never gave an opinion, it was just a question. Whom are you to judge me, just for asking?
More the Merrier! If I could afford to adopt(knowing the cost for just paper work) I would. There are so many children, that need good homes. If the children are happy and healthy....hats off to them!

Answer 1

Just because someone isn't married doesn't mean they won't be good parents. Putting a limit on something just because someone isn't married is a little extreme, as long as they can afford it, and the children are being taken care of, there really isn't a problem.

Answer 2

why?

As long as she can take care of those children, she should be able to have as many as she likes. In a society that is becoming predominantly single parent, and with an overpopulation of orphans throughout the world, why not let a caring, willing, and able person adopt? There is no need to deny her simply because she has other young ones or is not married. That's ridiculous. Those children are way better off than they were before she adopted them and it is nice to see a celebrity do something positive (for a change).

Answer 3

Why? Have the children been harmed in anyway? Why should she get married to adopt? Who are you to judge their household?
Her children are thriving, and being married to adopt is no guarantee that they would not be harmed. Look at that married "Christian" couple in Ohio who adopted 10 kids and they were just convicted of torturing the children by putting then in cages
I say kudos to Angie and Brad, they have their family, live outside of the spotlight which will ground these children, they are teaching them the value of giving, they are close in age which will give them a greater chance to bond,play and share with each other.

Answer 4

why is that anybodys business? no offense