English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Its a possibility. And if it does, d'yu think it is pro-McCann or anti-McCann?
Methinks it would be anti-McCann for that would give it ample justification for its crime. It must think its done a great job.
Just imagine guys (& one venerable duck...), it saved little Madeleine from living with such irresponsible, selfish & frivolous
parents. They neglected her so they don't deserve her. Look, (it must be thinking to itself) even intellectuals on YA have noticed how Kate is tying ribbons in her "newly highlighted" (grrrrrrrrr) hair & "rolling her eyes" (grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr) and how Gerry is so cold & hard & smug (GRRRRRRRR) & how he doesn't have blood but a deep dark sludge (GRRRRRRR) in his heart. It must be quite content in the fact that it is not alone but in good company.

In case its too much to imagine such evil scum reading all our little posts, maybe there are other potential abductors eyeing their neighbours little children, finding fault with their parental skills & hatching evil plots to abduct them & save them from such parents.

My point is get beyond Kate & Gerry leaving their babies unattended; they will be judged by law for it & they are being judged by life as it is. Have more faith in the Brit legal system. Don't cut them down for their temperaments & subsequent course of actions.
You are helping abductors rationalise their behavior. Other little children may pay heavily for your petty spite.

2007-06-07 21:42:46 · 6 answers · asked by Faith 6 in News & Events Current Events

DaveS:No, of course not, all kidnappings would not stop, even if you & yours stopped ranting. The point i'm struggling to make is to please try & distinguish between their fault (leaving the babies alone) & their consequent behaviour. Hound them for their fault/crime in leaving their babies alone & do whatever you have to bring them to book...but going tangent on their blood consistency trivialises the issue & makes for a witchhunt that other gossipmongers just thrive on. Don't...its not fair.

2007-06-07 22:23:44 · update #1

6 answers

Abductors don't need someone like me to rationalise their behaviour. Do you honestly think if I wasnt speaking out against the McCanns that all of a sudden the kidnappings around the world would grind to a halt?? Cmon now Faith, I want to treat you like an intelligent woman but seriously, give me something to work with here.

I for one have VERY LITTLE faith that the McCanns will face justice for the neglect of their child. The police havent brought it up and certainly nobody in the media has asked about it so we need to keep the pressure up to ensure they do face justice.

As for the abductor reading Yahoo Answers, that could be a distince possibility, but equally it would be likely that they read ALL the forums, discussions regarding Maddie. I hardly think Yahoo Answers is that big that it would warrant all of the abductors attention.

p.s I wrote the 'not blood but deep dark sludge' comment. Personally I thought it was quite funny!!

2007-06-07 21:55:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

hi 17pdr... long term no see you're spot on, as quickly as returned. there's no longer something astounding approximately what's occurring interior the McCann case.... On since the McCanns weren't being believed everywhere on earth, they desperate till now on "enable's enable the furor to die down for a 12 months or 2 and then we are able to initiate attempting to discredit the Portuguese police in an extremely final yet in all probability effective (they concept) attempt to get the McCann extra off the hook. --the difficulty is that the international settled with the conviction that the MvcCanns refrained from the study and which would be via fact they're responsible. and because peope everywhere in the planet are uninterested in the entire subject and have already desperate who's responsible (the McCanns) they won't pay any interest to any extra stupid tries, like this one, at discrediting a respected western eu police stress. How infantile ! besides to "the fact Of The Lie", Dr. Amaral has written yet another e book fairly saying the comparable ingredient. interior of united statesa. 2 books have additionally been written helping Dr. Amaral and protecting additionally the Madeleine died interior the place of abode. So i do no longer think of there is a lot that the McCanns and prolonged relatives can do attempt to shop the McCanns's attractiveness. This recent ingredient is in my opinion no longer something yet an attempt to sparkling the McCanns's call on the fee of absolutely everyone, as a result on the fee of Dr. Amaral yet, all yet returned, they won't be triumphant. I say, like hundreds of thousands of others, that i % to have confidence the Police in fee of the study and not the McCanns. The PJ Police have no longer something to earnings while the McCanns have each little thing to earnings for pushing the kidnapping lie forward.

2016-11-07 22:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I do agree with you.

However, the 'abductor' only has to watch the news to see firsthand, there's no need to trawl through the internet.

I had a thought that if Madeleine had been 'taken to order' for a rich childless couple, there's no way they would hand her back after watching the performances of her remorseless parents on the news.

There's something odd about the way the McCanns are handling this. Their advisors should be sacked and they should be advised by normal people.

2007-06-08 00:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by Delly xx 5 · 1 0

Mmmmmmm. I kind of see your point Faith and in a way I hope that you are right that she was snatched, if indeed she was snatched, to rescue her from her parents. But an abductor with a kids' best interests at heart would know that the kid would be inconsolable at being away from its parents, however bad those parents are.

2007-06-07 21:56:09 · answer #4 · answered by lou b 6 · 0 0

I doubt it very much. Whoever has taken or knows anything about Madeleine are well and truly hiding something deep down. The abductor could even be underground, who knows.

2007-06-07 22:46:03 · answer #5 · answered by CT 6 · 0 0

Ask the McCanns and their friends. One of them will know.

2007-06-07 23:10:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers