What the main cause was the burning of the Jet Fuel. The Jet Fuel burned at a very high temperature, and it melted the steal bars and had caused the buildings to collapse.
Thats the most reasonable and most scientific reason. To me thats really the reason that makes the most sence.
2007-06-07 20:07:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Offizier J.E. 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
This is just getting old. I have read it all just about. Unlike the CT types I read both sides. The conspiracy theories regardign 9/11, comprehensively including bldg 7, the pentagon and all the rest have summarily shown to be heresay, unchecked rumors, misunderstandings, along with a few outright lies.
More than 95% of the supposed evidence has been not only disproven, its been totally quashed, destroyed, and tossed in the trash. The rest of it is just unverifiable and inconsequential.
I am tired of posting links that I guess some people wont read because they 'want' to believe the conspiracies.
This isnt all aimed at the asker btw.
2007-06-07 21:20:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by sociald 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Controlled Demolitions pure and simple! Get the book by David Ray Griffin "Debunking 9/11 Debunking in which it takes apart the the Popular Mechanics theory of planes and fire damage resulting in the collapses. Even NIST's explanation only goes as far as the plane impacts and the fire PRIOR to the collapse of all three buildings! Please do this before you make up your mind.
Addendum: To answer fateridders question about "conspiracy theorists" pooling their money and presenting their case in a court of law. The answer to your question is evidence. However, the State (government) illegally tampered with a crime scene and shipped the evidence over to China before a proper investigation was conducted. Under the law, there should have been prosecutions for the destruction of evidence. This is why so many Americans distrust the government's and the Popular Mechanics' analysis. Where's their evidence!!!!!!!!
2007-06-07 20:07:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
You are a mindless sheep who believe theories from less the expert opinion. People need to get a grip on themselves with this subject . Science has proved that the impact and the heat did cause the destruction of the towers. If you did not believe facts and will follow nutty opinion , it really explains the state of affairs in our country today.
2007-06-07 21:01:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by meathead 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Defiently the impact. The Second tower once it was hit did not cause as many casualities since the impact of the place did not take out all flights of stairs. On the first tower it did cutting out all means of escape to anyone above.
2007-06-07 20:10:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
There's a lot of morons who claim that 911 was not an inside job around. Let me simply say this. You don't know or understand everything about 911 period end of story.
2007-06-07 22:11:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
well those are all factors but i think at a 500mph 2 ton airplane hitting a building that fast i think the impact alone would make it fall but then you have the explosion part when metal heats up it weakens which means that it would bend and lose its sturdiness so both building s fell of mulit factors welll hope this helps
2007-06-07 20:00:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jane M 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
The American government has and is fooling many people, they are not fooling me with their ridiculous explanations for the happenings of 911.
2016-04-01 09:27:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once the first floor collapsed the weight doubled tripled and so on on the floor below it. So the weight was compounded.
2007-06-08 02:36:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Controlled explosion...it's obvious from watching the footage on the TV. I could imagine the top of the towers being totally obliverated by the "planes", but the rest....
2007-06-07 20:01:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jock 6
·
4⤊
4⤋