I would be tempted but thats more of a question for the ladies, lol.
2007-06-07 19:23:59 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
only if they knew and were okl w/ it which i doubt
2007-06-07 19:26:13 · answer #1 · answered by Lindsey 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well. I think it depends. If the person I am marrying is almost dead, like Anna Nicole did, then sure. Cause after a few years, he'll be dead and I can collect the cash and live however I wanted after that. Sounds cold hearted, but I'd do it if I were desperate enough for the money. If the guy was in good health and younger, probably not. Love is always more important than money, even if I am starving to death.
2007-06-07 19:28:18 · answer #2 · answered by Chris C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's not what marriage is all about. You need to be financially stable yourself before you marry, then you don't have to marry for the wrong reasons. What would you do if you married someone for financial reasons. A couple of years into the marriage you meet someone else and fall in love and realize how empty your marriage is.
2007-06-07 19:30:24 · answer #3 · answered by The pink panther 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you did and they knew that you did, then eventually wouldn't you have to start to love them for providing you with that finacial security? What reasons are there for loving a person? If someone that wasn't as good looking or funny but worked hard to provide you with a healthy and comfortable life then that seems like a pretty nobel thing and also worthy of love. So I guess I am arguing that even if you did marry for money that eventually you might love the person if they were allways there to lovingly provide it.
2007-06-07 19:27:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It's better to marry someone with some form of stability than no stability at all. But than that person have to be comfortable to be with. The odds of finding someone who you LOVE & HAVE financial stability might be slim. All the good ones are taken.
2007-06-07 19:29:31 · answer #5 · answered by doglover 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You and your husband purely could communicate with regard to the area returned. All issues are not appropriate, yet whilst he says that he will artwork 2 jobs and you may stay at homestead which contain your newborn (it does not purely earnings you, it advantages the entire relatives.... so NO its no longer selfish) and he's advantageous that it fairly is a few thing he can cope with doing himself (bringing homestead the 1st Baron Verulam i recommend) then do it! in easy terms you 2 understand whats going to artwork for you. Bringing a infant into the international is a good ingredient, besides the undeniable fact that it could additionally be very stressful in many factors (financially, bodily, mentally, ect.). You 2 purely could shop your verbal exchange going, and attempt your toughest to no longer snap on the least confusing of issues. you may understand (and so does your husband) which you are going to have your way of doing issues, and he will have his way of doing issues. You the two could be on the comparable web site, artwork at the same time, and on the top of the evening (if the newborn is snoozing and time is allowing :) ) then have some on my own time and revel in it as much as you may. It wont harm your marriage except you enable it. elevating a newborn at the same time can the two make your courting greater or it could ruin you aside. fairly, its all on the way you 2 artwork at the same time. verbal exchange is top. i wish I helped, and congratulations!
2016-11-07 22:31:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm imagining :
i marry someone for his money knowing that he's not my behalf.
sooner or later, i would probably fall in love with someone n it will be to late. because i dont love the one with whom i am, my heart will be full of love for an other guy. n i will not be satisfied.
i marry the rich, i have all material needs n wants, a castle for me, the best jaguar, a high social status. n then ? there will be a time when i will get bored with all these. cant buy love with money.
another situation: i piss off with the guy i already know n with whom i'm madly in love, n choose the one who is a 'richard' . i will probably spend my whole life thinking of the sweet man i left for money.
i will have the richard in my bed. i would make love without love, maybe a baby without love.
result: deep suffering. unsatisfied life.
love is happiness.
money is evil.
2007-06-07 19:45:59 · answer #7 · answered by eMJy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! That would be disgusting. Who wants to sleep next to someone night after night they don't love. I wouldn't marry a bum like mentioned above ( i agree there) But Love i what makes people, it also helps make sucess.
Good luck! If you do marry for money....you will probably be misrable.
2007-06-07 19:29:25 · answer #8 · answered by pinkribbons&walking4boobies 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no, I couldn't even DATE someone for financial responsibility. I want someone who I love, even if we have to kind of struggle to make ends meet. Don't confuse that, cuz I would never marry someone who refused to work or something though.
2007-06-08 14:58:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can provide my own financial stability. Why bother marrying someone just for that.
2007-06-07 21:35:06 · answer #10 · answered by Snowflake 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
humm it is tempting not gonna lie pero i grew up making my own money and well now that i am where i wanna be no i wouldn't if you would have asked me that question a few years ago i would have jumped and said hells yea but now my way of thinking is that there is nothing anyone can buy me that i cant get for myself
2007-06-07 19:31:24 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋