English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

These two canidates are the best canidates from their sides. I dont know why there is any question. Mitt Romney is the best republican and Barrack Obama is the best democrat. Why is there any question? I watched both their debates. No i do not agree with both their idea's entirely but they would help the American people the most. Please someone convince me otherwise, enlighten me. You will fo sho not get the best answer if you say ignorant crap with no backing.

2007-06-07 18:10:05 · 13 answers · asked by jared l 4 in Politics & Government Elections

Ok i picked these guy because they have core but very broad beliefs and leaves nothing behind. They are very decisive make the best decisions and dont sound ignorant about them. They get to the point and are better at doing this than the rest of the canidates. Why i dont pick Hillary is because she is full of herself and make stupid remarks like blaming the whole entire war on Bush, on a single person, very childish. I dont like Edwards because he made himself sound stupid a couple of times and i dont want my president to sound stupid. I dont like McCain as much as i used to because he is for amnesty and is getting a lil bit too old. Rudi is liberal my 2nd choice behind Romney but Rudi seams a little full of himself a lil smidge and i dont like that, i want my leader to be for the people. Rudi believes in torturing people in coarse of interrogation. Everyone else isnt included.

2007-06-07 18:25:21 · update #1

Nandina that is personal issues that i dont care about. Could be a car, could be a icecream flavor, could be a career. People do it all the time look at Billy Donovan from the Gators, signed with Orlando Magic and changed his mind. Obama didnt do anything that affected anyone in this choice, he decided he is just running for office.

2007-06-08 05:02:43 · update #2

13 answers

Wow..These are the same two I think are the best...Im going with Obama overall because hes not an insider like the rest of them. His "inexperience" is a good thing to me. But if Obama is not the Dem nominee I will go with Mitt Romeny...Romney looks like the stereotypical president but hes a great communicator and I like that he has a business background..If Romney or Huckebee isnt the nominee Im voting for the unnamed dem.

2007-06-07 18:45:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

You picked them because you think Mitt Romney will be the president and if he is VP the president will find death and Mitt will take his seat. You are a Mormon Jared. Very interesting. What will you do? Put it in Obama's water?

No way! When Obama wins, he will take a Democrat to the House with him, and that is the best we could want, it won't happen any other way. Are you hoping Obama is watching this insanity we are writing here? Well, I have it first hand that he takes a peek, so go at it bud. You are on a roll, and tumbling downhill fast.

Guess what? I might be an authority on Mormon life, and don't you have a wife to take care of at this hour? Kind of late isn't it? You should be working on another baby or something, or preparing to go into the clinic tomorrow. Eh?

2007-06-07 21:35:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Barak Obama has a proven track record of flip-flopping on his word when it suits him to do so. Either he's untrustworthy and will do a 180 depending on the prevailing winds, or he's too naive to be speaking in public when he throws out words like "absolutely" without understanding what they really mean.

For example:

SEN. OBAMA: No. You know, I can’t speculate on those kinds of things. What I have said is that, you know, I’m not focused on running for higher office, I’m focused on doing the job that the people of Illinois just sent me to do.

[...]

MR. RUSSERT: But there seems to be an evolution in your thinking. This is what you told the Chicago Tribune last month: “Have you ruled out running for another office before your term is up?” Obama answer: “It’s not something I anticipate doing.” But when we talked back in November of ‘04 after your election I said, “There’s been enormous speculation about your political future. Will you serve your six-year term as United States senator from Illinois?” Obama: “Absolutely.”

SEN. OBAMA: I will serve out my full six-year term. You know, Tim, if you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things. But my thinking has not changed.

MR. RUSSERT: So you will not run for president or vice president in 2008?

SEN. OBAMA: I will not.

--- "Meet the Press", Jan 22, 2006

Nine months later:

The Illinois Democrat said he could no longer stand by the statements he made after his 2004 election and earlier this year that he would serve a full six-year term in Congress. He said he would not make a decision until after the Nov. 7 elections.

-- NBC News, Oct 22, 2006

2007-06-07 18:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by Nandina (Bunny Slipper Goddess) 7 · 0 2

Romney has assured hinmself a good chunk of the Military Industrial Complex by declaring he would triple the concentration camps, Wheeee!

I wonder how many people think hiding the fact that his dad is radical Islam and represents himself like Afro-
american is a minor trivial fact. Obama MauMau Kenya.

ps when you say 'everyone else is not included' you remind me of the media

2007-06-07 20:08:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Actually I think Mitt or Rudy would be the best two candidates but they are both republican (I voted Dem in the past 3 presidential elections), Barak has no backbone.

2007-06-07 18:15:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Obama has no record of accomplishment & no leadership experience. This week he seems to have tried to incite a race war. If he is the best the Dems have to offer, they are in real trouble. Of course Hillary & Edwards are also disasters, so he may be the Dem's best hope. Sad.

2007-06-07 18:19:07 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 4 2

No way is this country ready for a African American in the office.. I'm sorry, but this guy has no chance to become president.. i don't for see a black president for at least another 10-15 years minimum. And his name.. Obama is going to remind voters of Osama and thats enough to keep him out too....

We do need a Democrate, but not this guy at this time.. maybe down the road when we know him for years will he be excepted....

2007-06-07 18:20:11 · answer #7 · answered by Vindicatedfather 4 · 1 3

You want backing for answers given but you haven't provided your reasoning for picking them as the best candidates.

2007-06-07 18:13:20 · answer #8 · answered by BOOM 7 · 4 1

I think Fred Thomson(or many others) is better than Romney. For Romney, all he got going for him is he got load of cash and he is 1st Mormon candidate.

2007-06-07 18:33:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No. Romney isn't a real Republican, he is a liberal.

And Obama is barely out of diapers. He is political lightweight.

2007-06-07 18:13:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers