Please help me finish this paragraph im stuck?

Question

In many cases anarchy is a major attack on the government, and it finally defeats it completely. As citizens of our country, we should, and also need to protect our government officials/people set above us, from hostile invasions and attacks. I can think of at least four hostile invasions towards the government of America: one, WWII with Hitler, Nazis, and the killing of the Jews; two, the Islam nation such as the War in Iraq, and 9-11; three, the Cuban Missile Crises with Cuba, America, and Russian; and four, the Zimmerman Telegram with the intercepted telegram from Germany to Mexico. <

Answer 1

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Even out dim witted president finally admitted that.

Answer 2

In many cases anarchy is a major attack on the government:

- Kings had ruled by anarchy which left none or little hope for the people. Thus, governments were designed to balance the powers of anarchy for one particular person or group. It doesn't exist for people to rise in anarchy...that's hilarious!!

As citizens of our country, we should and also need to protect our government officials/people set above us, from hostile invasions and attacks:

The government were designed to protect it's people and country, they are the ones responsible with the budget to do so. Additionally, Americans spends 10's of millions of dollars protecting those people and their families, and it doesn't end after they leave public office, it's lifetime as long as they need it or when they request it to stop.

As for the rest of your statement you need to research more before making your misconstrued comments.

Answer 3

First of all we attacked Iraq. While certain groups have attacked the US via acts of terrorism, if you are going to include them you should also include the bombing in Oklahoma, actions taken by the KKK, and other American terrorist groups who have been attacking us since the sixties. Secondly, the Cuban missle crisis was not an invasion it was Russia putting missles in Cuba and the US freaking out about it (not that I really blame them). Hitler didn't attack the US, Japan did. As for any of these attacks having to do with anarchy, well they have as much to do with anarchy as the US fighting the Native Americans. It is about spreading your government, not destroying all government.

Answer 4

I think you need to change the part about anarchy being a major attack on the government, to it being a major attack on the people it governs. Anarchy is a way of governing, like a wicked king would do. I would take out the sentence about trying to protect our elected officials and instead put that as american citizens, we need to protect our rights and freedoms from being taken away from the people by big government programs, spending and corrupt government leaders who want more power. It is ourselves we need to protect, not the people who are elected. Many times, they are evil and corrupt. Then, I would stick to your thought about anarchy. You have tried to give some examples of invasions, but to me, it doesn't have much to do with the anarchy thought. So take all the invasion stuff out, because anarchy comes from within a government. YOu could possibly give some examples of anarchy rule, such as Hitler, Stalin, Fidel Castro, the King of England(King George). These people ruled with anarchy. YOu could possibly say that there are great threats to Americans at this time because of the executive orders that the Presidents of the u.s. have become so enchanted with. They have been granting themselves all kinds of executive powers that are not theirs to grant, and therefore we are heading towards anarchy. Anarchy takes away the power of the people to govern themselves and gives it to the wicked few who want power. You could say that without the interest of the citizens of the United States in maintaining their rights and freedoms, that they are very likely to be taken away from them. Talk about the importance of knowing what the constitution really says and being a watchdog in protecting us from the people who would crush it and abuse their power. YOu could also talk about how the founding fathers tried to create a balanced system of government, with the President really not having a lot of power. They tried to create this balance so no one power in the federal government could get much control. They also delegated alot of power to the states so that they could make their own decisions. That's about all I can think of. Good luck. Make a clear concisive arguement and case. Don't try to get fancy and include too much info. Say what you want to say, and if this is your last paragraph, end it in a strong way.

Answer 5

OMG! You must be going to a government school to believe that the people serve the government.

Dude, it's the other way around. The government serve the people!

Answer 6

till death do us part. ha, ha, ha.