I don't think it will give the common man any security...it might reduce his wages and give others his job
2007-06-07 17:12:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The present day globalisation is only based on opportunity. There is no uniform code and no universal practices that gloablisation can be applied. In true sense, there is no globalisation in the world in the present status. What we have is only partial globalisation and that is based on oppurtunity as dictated by the developed nations.
2007-06-07 18:07:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lavgan 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The pros are only for the wealthiest 3% percent (or so) in the world, the cons are its a bad thing for the 97% that remain. Globalization is designed to reduce wealth into as few hands as possible; its the ultimate big brother and the comming of the anti-christ.
2007-06-07 17:16:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
The pro's are the elite leaders would be free to eliminate 80% of us usless eaters! Oh thats right they are already working activly on this!
It all boils down to the least common demonitor. The whole world would need to be brought nearly to the Chineese pessant level to have equaty. It couldn't possabily work other wise.Of course this wouldn't include the elite who would own everything and have total control. If you open your eyes and look around you will see we are nearly there!
2007-06-07 17:19:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
One World One Nation is what we need to be afraid of. And to rid ourselves of organizations like NAFTA, and to push away from the table when Mexico or the Phillipines start crying for our jobs.
2007-06-07 17:01:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
no pros / the whole thing is a con
the rich get richer / the poor get poorer and lose all of their rights / the middle class vanishes / Karl Marx does the Mexican Hat Dance in Hell with his lover Satan
2007-06-07 17:02:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
With Caliberated approach it connects people lets use others positive experience and saves time and energy to reinvent wheel.
If unchecked and followed with greed alone...............
The one's without any culture, ethics, value system and respect for nature and its occupants loose out to one's who have nothing therefore are bolder and possess higher risk taking ability and succeed................albeit on several others shoulders including future generations.
2007-06-07 20:17:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Agyanee 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
pros's zilch cons base's loaded
2007-06-07 17:04:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael N 6
·
4⤊
0⤋