English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I will not vote for McCain for dog catcher. If he gets my party's nomination, I am voting a third party. Will everyone that was against amnesty (Republican and Democrat) do the same. If so, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton and McCain should all get new jobs.

2007-06-07 14:30:58 · 18 answers · asked by John 2 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

Off course I will never vote for ANY candidate who supports the amnesty bill... this is a way of rewarding ILLEGALS...

2007-06-07 14:53:27 · answer #1 · answered by the orphan 2 · 2 0

While I'm a conservative and a registered Republican I always vote the issues. Some of the best votes I've cast in the past have been for a Democrat.

That being said I am with you 100%. ANY candidate that supports amnesty will not have my vote regardless of party affiliation.

I've always said we need a viable third party, and term limits.

2007-06-07 14:41:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Absolutely not. I'm a Republican, but if McCain wins the nomination (I'm with you) I'll vote for a third party candidate that's not so quick to give our country away.

2007-06-07 14:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by Karma 6 · 5 0

Not just the Presidential candidates. I hope the South Carolina voters throw McCain's little lap puppy, Lindsey Graham, over the rail the next time he's up.

2007-06-07 14:38:17 · answer #4 · answered by nileslad 6 · 2 0

properly... those links do no longer likely inform you lots, yet Mike Huckabee matched my ideals earlier and after checking all the links. user-friendly Tax is one among my sought after issues approximately him. i've got considered his checklist and that i've got heard all of this earlier. he's not professional amnesty and that i'm unsure the place you get that from. This quote is from his website "i'm antagonistic to amnesty - i think that people who got here right here illegally years in the past and at the instant are regulation-abiding taxpayers could pay an significant nice as admission of their guilt and have a variety of deportation or a rigorous technique in direction of legal status." and how the hell is he professional socialized well-being. "we don't desire universal well-being care mandated via federal edict. We do could get extreme approximately preventive well-being care. I recommend rules which will inspire the internal maximum sector to hunt for imaginitive consumer-friendly the thank you to deliver down expenses." The tax will improve you communicate of have been the electorate decision. He decreased taxes over one hundred circumstances saving taxpayers over 370 million money. Even after that there became a 850 million greenback surplus in arkansas whilst he left, which he entreated mike beebe to offer back. He in all probability did make a mistake on some pardons yet he continues to be my fav. in 08. thank you on your concern nonetheless. a minimum of you have heard of him.

2016-11-07 21:57:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course not, but there is something even more sinister in this bill than the amnesty part of it! They used amnesty as the hot button - in order to distract people from the REAL problem in this bill (which can be read in full online btw). In order to turn right against left, as usual, to DISTRACT US.

* The bill, even when the amnesty part is revised, requires every American citizen to have the new American ID card. We will each have to go through Federal clearance, the same level as a US passport. We will not be able to get paid or have a bank account without this card. It's the equivelent of the 'papers' that everyone was issued in Nazi Germany, and I exaggerate not! (read on)

* There is something very under-reported in the works between the Bush administration, Canada and Mexico. It is called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. It is an extension of NAFTA, and its goal is expand our borders in order to protect us from terrorism, make trade across borders easier for the corporations, and MOST importantly force (YES FORCE) Mexico and Canada to privatize their OIL.

* After Katrina, Homeland Security contracted Haliburton to prepare hundreds of 'illegal immigrant detention and processing centers' for opening their doors. (google this please) There is room to house at least 1 million people; illegal aliens and God knows who else!

* Bush is holding this over Mexico's head, trying to force Mexico into agreeing on this Partnership in order to get the OIL.

*The Partnership is unconstitutional; it greatly inhibits our sovereignty in the US and in Mexico and Canada. It is for Big Money, who is driven by the Military Industrial Complex which is out to acquire OIL.

* Bush has based his war strategy on the PNAC (Project for a New American Century), which was written by Wolfowitz and Libby. (look it up - its all there!) It justifies pre-emptive strikes if there is enough 'evidence' to prove a threat to our resources. There are billionaires trying to secure the OIL in the world because our economy is petroleum based. They are willing to stop at nothing to do so!

* The same business people on the board of directors in the Mainstream Media are also on the board of directors in all the corporations that profit BIG TIME from Oil and War. The neocons and the new democrats answer to the War Profiteers, NOT the people. They are the majority of our elected officials! They are trying to take over our government, and if this Partnership deal goes through, America is DEAD.

* This is what they don't want us knowing so they don't report it on the news. They are purposefully keeping the PEOPLE in the dark! America is at great risk - NOT from the Republicans or the Democrats but from the TRAITORS posing as public servants. Their agenda is NOT ours! The future they are planning will benefit the very rich only! We are facing feudalism again. WAKE UP!!!

* The next bill wont have amnesty but it will still further their REAL objective, which is to get the Partnership passed, and force Mexico into privatizing their OIL.

Don't believe me? I dare you to google it and see for YOURSELF!

2007-06-07 15:08:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I cannot vote for any candidate that wants to allow illegal trespassers into our country. They will lose my vote. I am a Minutewoman, and cannot fathom, or tolerate illegals. I need to study-up on each and every candidates policies, not just their words. Words are a powerful source, and a weapon. I would know, I am a poet. Words are used to get elected, as I am sure you know. "George Bush Sr: "No New Taxes." Well, now, that was just a lie, wasn't it?

2007-06-07 14:39:39 · answer #7 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3 0

Not a single one and I'd like to see McCain go down in flames. That total jerk. Who the hell does he think he is anyway?

2007-06-07 14:45:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Gotta say I agree with you. I will *not* vote for McCain now. Hillery and Obama have always scared me.

I want Sen John Warner from VA!! (Ugh... surely he didn't vote for this fiasco... may edit soon....)

2007-06-07 14:37:09 · answer #9 · answered by MotherBear1975 6 · 2 0

I don't vote, or not vote, for a candidate based on their position on a single issue.

2007-06-07 14:38:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers