why not both for the same person I still love and lust after my man eight years later.
2007-06-07 14:12:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by hourglass_beauty 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Love's got lust covered.
2007-06-07 21:11:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Æsir 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love
2007-06-07 21:17:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm with lust though, i will have time to fall in love, but for right now, I'm with lust, like Gabrielle Solis said, "a guy is like a buying a car, u have to try it first." that's so true, lol, anyway lust is more fun, and better.
2007-06-07 21:15:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lust probably comes first because of a physical attraction is what draws us to a partner , however for it to last I think it would have to be love. Living with somebody for as many years as a good marriage would last and put up with each other's idiosyncracies or weaknesses it has to be love.
2007-06-07 21:23:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love first, and the lust will follow.
2007-06-07 21:20:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by S K 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
love at first sight .... uhm .. no!
Lust at first sight ...
i guess everyone wants to find love .. but really .. all we end up with most of the time is lust and lust doesn't hurt as bad as real true blue love so ... imma go with lots of lust and one true love to last me till im 90 =)
oxoxoxoxoxox
⥠Emily â¥
2007-06-08 08:03:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥ Emily ♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
when I was younger, lust. But now I'm married and it's love
2007-06-07 21:10:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My relationships have always started with lust, but they don't always lead to love. I am always happier when there is love, so I choose love.
2007-06-07 22:36:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Clear as a Bell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both
2007-06-07 21:10:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by jrsygrl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋