English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Based on what the Senate Judiciary Committee did today the Democrats are giving me every indication that if al-qaeda wanted Los Angeles as their new base in the US, the Senate would say okay.

When do you think the senate will get it, they are supposed to represent the States, not the terrorists.

So which port is the Senate going to designate a nuclear weapon introduction zone?

This guys have gone too far, first the travesty called amnesty and no this. Keep this in mind when you go to vote in 08, who is giving our country away to our enemies.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070607/ap_on_go_co/guantanamo_detainees;_ylt=Alx7R95OYAb5OG0bW06Ku0CyFz4D

2007-06-07 13:28:26 · 18 answers · asked by rmagedon 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

18 answers

Pure unadulterated appeasement.

Will the military relinquish them? Seems like the as long as the military interests outweigh the civilian courts, they should be able to "just say no."

Maybe I can get Sargent in here . . .

What if we handed them over to the country where we found them?

2007-06-07 17:02:45 · answer #1 · answered by Moneta_Lucina 4 · 1 0

I'm fine with building an Isolated POW camp on US soil to house these monsters. I wonder if Obama will volunteer his family's home in Hawaii for a new supermax prison. Or we could retrofit Alcatraz for them. I'm sure Nancy Pelosi would like that. There's terrible unemployment in Puerto Rico. I bet they won't mind. Or maybe just send them up to one of the Aleutian Islands in Alaska. If the concern is just that having them on foreign soil side steps the justice system then I'm all for bringing them to a fully secure facility on US territory. They should be treated as any other POW. Which according to geneva convention regulations, Non-uniformed enemy combatants are considered spys and are to be executed. That would save us a lot of money.

2016-05-19 05:26:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The democart party seems to be in bed with terrorists following the lead of burka wearing Nancy and draft dodging Hairy Reid, who is studying Islam for possible conversion, makes me wonder how much of that cold 90 gs found in the congressman's freezer came from Al Qaeda! After all Slick willie 86ed a chance at destroying AL Qaeda and Bin Ladden, must of been a reason...........

2007-06-08 02:18:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It looks like it, doesn't it? Did you ever doubt it? I didn't. Remember Spain, and the attack on one of their trains that killed 300 people? Remember right after that al-Qaeda claimed responsibility, and said "you got this for helping America." What did Spain do? Elect a Socialist, instead of the Democratic leader. Gee, aren't Democrat's socialist's? They, for the most part want Hillary for president. What is she? A Socialist. You're welcome

2007-06-07 14:04:32 · answer #4 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1 0

Since name calling seems to be the way people prefer to communicate on political topics...let's do it right...

To all the bleeding heart Liberal democrats...and right wing neo-Nazi republicans...LISTEN UP...You're all Fascists...with a capital F.

Your continued efforts to intimidate, insult, disparage and threaten people on the other side of the political fence is fascism pure and simple...and it's polarizing the nation. If it continues unabated, it will eventually jeopardize the existence of the greatest democracy the world has ever known. Congratulations!!!

Here's a thought...why don't YOU TRY AND ACTUALLY THINK FOR YOURSELF...at least once in a while...instead of moronically spewing forth the latest RNC or DNC BS rhetoric...and then acting like the "other side" is the sole cause of the problem.

That's it...you liberals may go back to obsessing on how you plan to save the world...and you neo-cons please feel free to go back to waving the flag of Holier-than -thou Christianity.

Sad, pathetic little Fascists.

2007-06-07 13:37:40 · answer #5 · answered by widewillie 4 · 2 2

No the Republican President Bush is already doing that. Ask yourself, did we get the guy behind 9/11? How about when Bush tried to sell out ports to the Saudis. If you don't know the truth its always good to study.

2007-06-07 13:33:37 · answer #6 · answered by oldhag 5 · 3 2

Al Qaeda's Chief Of Ops Has Startling Background
Once again, "Al Qaeda" tracks back to Mossad
http://www.rense.com/general53/dldon.htm

Wolfowitz: Iraq Was Not Involved In 9-11 Terrorist Attacks,
No Ties To Al-Qaeda
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LEO308A.html

Wolfowitz-Perle Training the Next al-Qaeda
New "Iran-Contra" creating new "Al Qaeda"?
http://pub89.ezboard.com/fphillyburbsfrm3.showMessage?topicID=60.topic

al-Qa’eda Trained By US
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4686.htm

Al Qaeda does not exist and never has
http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/397/13821_AlQaeda.html

'al Qaeda': A Non-Entity Before 9/11
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/alqaeda_nonentity.html

al-Qaeda: A Day Late and a Few Billion Dollars Short
http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=493

'Al-Qaeda' is a Manufactured Intelligence Front
http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/june2004/062504manufacturedfront.htm

'Al Qaeda Itself Does Not Exist'
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/0622-Qaeda.html

'Al Qaeda' the Modern Incarnation of 'Emmanuel Goldstein'?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/goldstein.html

Al-Qaida has emerged stronger since 9-11
http://www.canada.com/news/world/story.asp?id=2BB4F951-A9C1-4AA4-A271-B14C6FFA0C9E

What if There's No Such Thing as "al-Qaeda"?
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_international&Number=646373&t=-1
The world's most infamous terror group: global conspiracy, or just good friends?

Bush Business Deals with 9 Partners of bin Laden’s Banker
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR403A.html

Is The US Lying About Al-Qaida Captures Too?
http://www.jihadunspun.com/intheatre_internal.php?article=67707&list=/ home.php&

Al Qaeda cells are Israeli creations, including the one claimed to have planned and carried out the 9-11 attacks.
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=241042

Israel 'faked al-Qaeda presence'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2550513.stm
ISRAELI MOSSAD = AL QUAIDA?
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=35565Is Israel committing fake "al Qaeda" attacks?

The Phony (Mossad) Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html

2007-06-07 13:59:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Remember it was President Bush that stated that he is not concerned about Osama and doesn't spend much time thinking about him. He said this only six months after 9/11. If a Democrat had said this, his head would have been called for.

2007-06-07 13:38:46 · answer #8 · answered by stephen v 2 · 2 2

i think you have a very short memory. Did you forget that it was George w that gave all of our major sea ports to the Arabs. And no the democrats are not going to give America to anyone Bush has already done that. what he has not give to the Arabs Cheney has give to haliburton. I think you do not read the news papers or listen to the news , oh i know you think that is all liberal too.

2007-06-07 13:51:13 · answer #9 · answered by roy40371 4 · 1 2

wow. i actually read that whole entire article, you should too, it only takes like 45 seconds. from what i gathered, no, the Democrats are not planning on giving America to al-qaeda.

2007-06-07 13:33:33 · answer #10 · answered by Diggy 5 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers