English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What make sno logical sense to me is the idea of the UNIVERSE BEING MADe. Like come on what the hell. There had to be some kind of area where the hydrogen or watever formed. So are universe has always been heer right??.. Or am i just confused and the defintin of universe is actaully the space around us with diff galaziees and ****.

2007-06-07 13:05:51 · 9 answers · asked by IsTaMaNtI 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

9 answers

look up Einsteins Relativity, is explains the big bang theory which is the modern vision of how the universe was created, but even this theory may not make sense to you because it states that the universe is always expanding and at some point it will implode on itself, destroying every part of matter originally created.

2007-06-07 13:24:32 · answer #1 · answered by hexa 3 · 0 0

In understanding the big bang, once must first get over the false impression that the universe began with a big bang or explosion. The physics involved with this never even imply that there was any kind of explosion.

For example astronomers know that the universe is a little larger, a bit colder and a lot less denser than it was say yesterday or the day before. Now, come on - this is the nature of cosmic expansion is it not? If you go backwards in time to the earliest moments after creation, you will surely see that the universe must have been smaller, hotter, and yes even denser than we observe it to be today.

For example when the visible universe was approximately half of its present size. the density of matter was about eight times higher. What we see today as the cosmic wave background, was probably double the heat that it is now.

Now, if the cosmic wave background was say a hundred times hotter, and the universe was even smaller, say a hundred times smaller than it is right now. then think of the chemical reactions going on at a molecular level. Or what if the universe was say a millionth it present size? The "CMB" would be in the neighborhood of 300 million kelvins above absolute zero. At this point in time the thickness of matter in space would be that of Earths atmosphere. At these temperatures the protons and electrons permeating space would be completely ionized, and moving ultra fast.

So with this in mind it would be a better explanation to say that the birth of the universe was more a CREATION than it was an explosion of light. A creation where matter, energy, and time all came into fruitioin at the same instance.

2007-06-11 05:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Universe only exist because you Exist. If you exist because you were always there,then so are you.
An atheist would denies the reality,which is that ,it is Our Creator which made the Universe. So Every living being exists because we have a Begining.So the Universe had a begining.This is very much Emphasized by Scientist and astrophysist Stephen Hawkings that the Universe came into being as also did Time.
There are so many question about the Universe ande space that does not make sense to certain people.The reason is that the most leaned, who think they have attained the answer having learned all ,actually know a little of every thing about nothing.If we keep an open mind about what is real then things about the Universe would make sense.

2007-06-08 01:22:35 · answer #3 · answered by goring 6 · 0 0

The problem you're having is the same problem most people have. We don't have the ability to understand creation from nothing, which is what the theory of the Big Bang and inflation theory describe.
But just because we can't understand something doesn't mean it isn't true (or at least possible).
Many people turn to divine intervention as a "creator", but that just begs the question "where did the creator come from" and so on back and back and ...

There doesn't have to be "some kind of area where the hydrogen or whatever formed" - we just think there has to be.
We have limits on what we can grasp intellectually, so we impose those limits on the cosmos as though our own limits are unwavering unbreakable laws.

2007-06-07 13:39:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

First of all you need to learn doing lesser mistakes when writing !! Second, fpolks, the Big Bang is just one of many theories. Nobody really claims the Universe "being" made, some claim it to be creation of God, so take it from there, if you believe in whatever God you might have ... and some claim the Universe grewn up from energy ... but not and never from nothing, because even a kind of energy matter, we cannot understand, still is something, and not "nothing". Hence, don't let others fool you and find you very own theory or the one you like to believe in.

2007-06-07 14:35:25 · answer #5 · answered by jhstha 4 · 0 1

No, it does not make sense. define what you advise by potential of potential, what you advise by potential of effective and destructive. And by potential of definition, if the potential existed previous to the formation of the universe this replaced into no longer a element of introduction, the potential itself could signify a universe!

2016-10-09 11:04:46 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It is hard to understand when it all came from but the universe really is a collection of galaxies in space.

2007-06-11 04:12:38 · answer #7 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0 0

The simple answer is that scientists are just as frustrated as you are. We know what happened pretty well AFTER the big bang started. We have no idea what happened before it. So join the club.

2007-06-07 15:18:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

y'know, our little minds are just too small to wrap around an issue such as that, donna' care who we are or how smart we is, our minds just cannot stretch to that.

2007-06-07 14:31:23 · answer #9 · answered by captsnuf 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers