why do people not believe the USA can not invade russia just because france and germany could not Bush is no?

Question

nopolean. Bush is great leader nopolean and hitler were not as history shows the USA can and must defeat russia

Answer 1

Best laugh I've had tonight!

Btw your command of the English language is only slightly worse than Dubya's!

Answer 2

If you read history I must say you failed. And you cant put the words in proper order. But still I will explain a few things to help you.

1 Bush is NOT a great leader. He IS a failed leader.
2 You can't compare Bush with Napoleon.
3 And the USA cant invade Russia successfully. If they could they would have long ago.

4 Finally, learn the correct spelling for Napoleon.

Answer 3

You miss the point, capitalism has to have or create an enemy and Russia has now been chosen by Bush and Co as the next victim and you can guarantee Messrs Brown and Co will throw their weight behind Bush
What would Bush say if Putin established a missile defence system in a South American state?
As for the fuss about the alleged poisoning of the Russian, that is a joke nothing is ever mentioned about the murder of Stephan Ward or the British secret services action in Northen Ireland in 1973 with the murder of catholic youths by the S A S on the instructions of P M Edward Heath to inflame the situation there.
Then there is the question mark on the death of Diana Windsor that will not go away.
To return to the American situation, check on the number of countries they have interfered with or invaded since 1946 and you will realise who the real aggressor really is.
It is a case of the pot calling the kettle black and the American and British public together with the victims of aggression have to pay dearly for something that was not of their making or concern.

Answer 4

I believe Bush couldn't invade Russia because Russia has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world.

I believe Bush also couldn't successfully invade Russia because the invasion of Iraq, a country smaller in population and vastly smaller in terms of area and nowhere near as militarily advanced was a shambles. Sure the leader was toppled - then what?

Answer 5

Lets get real shall we?.
America will never even attempt to invade Russia, even Bush is not that mad!. All these 'rednecks' who dream up these ideas do so out of ignorance. Whilst Russia may no longer be a superpower any nation attacking her will disappear in a cloud of nuclear dust.

Answer 6

America owns Russia. That country is in shambles. Its military is feeble and its dying population is no match for the young and vigorous population of the United States of America.

We dont need to invade Russia. America can knock over any government it wants - by way of military or political and economic means - and Russia is no exception. We all know what happened last time Russia screwed with America. Lets hope they are stupid enough to make us do it twice.

Answer 7

What's this 'nopolean' thing you mention? If you mean Napoleon, he was defeated at Waterloo in the UK, not in Moscow.

There's no petrol in Russia, why would Bush invade it? I think you're a bit behind in history.

Answer 8

I only wish I could understand the question. Are you saying Bush is a better leader than Hitler or Napoleon?

I think if Hitler or Napoleon had Bush's nukes we might be saying "What the hell is this Russia thing your talking about?"

And you'd all be wearing jackboots and eating cheese right now...

Answer 9

Scuse me, but if the US wants to shoot at Russia, and Russia shoot back, we are in the middle. Note how the missiles are conveniently placed in europe and not on the west coast of usa where they could also reach russia. If Bush wants to fight Russia, maybe he should be risking his own nation instead of ours. Your right, hes no napoleon. Hes a bit taller.

Answer 10

sides will extra then probable be this if this style of element easily ever did ensue: West: (extra then probable would be the Aggressors, bullying, could have them fall in line) US ecu Isreal S.Korea uk Canada Australia East: (extra then probable Defenders) (additionally, no longer probable an Alliance, in basic terms international locations with comparable enemy, the enemy of my enemy is my pal) Russia China N.Korea Iran Syria dissimilar so observed as 'Terrorist' agencies India, Pakistan, S.united statesa., a great form of the middle east will stay out, and everybody else in basic terms won't have the aptitude to connect, or would be compelled to stay out. status of Forces: West: much less Troops. frequently ecu Forces in many situations suck. Been reckoning on NATO too long, and their international locations have been liberalized, no longer solid for militia Canadian tension would be respectable, regular purposes Isreal Has solid Forces, yet they are going to be busy protecting themselves against the Hordes of the middle East. Austarlia would be busy interior the Pacific averting The chinese language S. Korea, and N.Korea would be devastated from the beginning up, effectively knocking out those forces. East: dissimilar Infantry Forces, Mass Armored Battalions, Mid-Grade technologies. Iran, and Syria would be busy with Israel, extra then probable each physique of those international locations would be Devastated interior the beginning up, All 3 would be Wastelands genuine gamers: US, Australia, and Canada (yeah i comprehend) VS. Russia, China. end result: NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST. WW IV fought with sticks and stones ------------------------------ And Chris, sorry to break it to you, yet final year the Russians examined a ICBM which could bypass all our risk-free practices protection structures, and we dont have sufficient Interceptor Missiles to resign all of Russia's ICBMs in any case.

Answer 11

Explain why the U.S. should invade Russia.

Considering that the U.S. is allies with a whole slew of countries in Europe, if we invaded Russia, and then called on our European allies to join in, the Russians would just cut off your natural gas supplies, like they threaten every time you piss them off.

We wouldn't want you to go without your gas, now would we?