English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-07 10:11:35 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

They launched a coup in Petrograd (now called St. Petersburg) against the provisional government of Alexander Kerensky. One of your quirks will be: "What was the date of the coup?" Russia was using the Julian calendar at that time, in which the date of the date of the coup was October 25, 1917. Westerners (U.S., France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Britain) were using the Gregorian calendar, in which the date was November 5. The Soviet government adopted the Gregorian calendar soon after the revolution (LOL).

This is why you have already seen a film, "The Hunt for Red October." Also! You must read "Ten Days that Shook the World," by John Reed. He was there, an American who reported on the Bolshevik coup to U.S. newspapers. Finally, to see what happened, you must see a film called "Reds." with Warren Beatty.

2007-06-07 10:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by steve_geo1 7 · 1 1

First, sheer conviction that the loads could help his ideology made him ambitious. He tried nationalising all agricultural land, that grow to be opposite to the fond expectancies of the peasantry who gave him ability & who yearned to be land-distributors (a undergo in ideas of delight & ego). on an identical time because it advance appropriate right into a undergo in ideas of simmering revolt cut back than the outdoors, he retracted his coverage. in the time of he grow to be sharing ability with the Mensheviks that he could desire to now no longer stay clean of. They legitimised ability. After the fall of Kerensky's government he dismantled that device steadily, nut via making use of bolt, until finally the Mensheviks have been made powerless. For that he had to hire ruthless ideas. He steadily moved in direction of absolute ability (as single party device, with all applicants from one party !). Surreptitiously he presented the farm nationalisation as collectives of 'Soviets'. it quite is the 'Soviets' that caught on, that now no longer quickly grow to be the possession of all factors & ability of production, via making use of the State. it quite is argued that it is not that the State is possessing each and all of the land; yet there is now no longer plenty to compliment on, grow to be obvious. It grow to be Economics that grow to be in concentration in the past him.

2016-11-26 23:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They took power through the 'Red October' revolution.

2007-06-07 10:20:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

they were funded by a rich jew in new york, no lie!

2007-06-07 14:39:34 · answer #4 · answered by chrismango13 3 · 0 1

serious?

2007-06-07 10:18:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers