Daniel,
People use yahoo answers to brag about their artificial I.Q. to boost their low self-esteem.
Artificial? Yes! No one so far has shown they have taken a legitimate I.Q. test such as WISC/WAIS, Stanford-Binet, or WJ. Therefore none of the I.Q. scores (including the guy who has already answered) are valid in any way.
If they argue otherwise, please ask them for the test's alpha coefficient.
In a prior question you posed I explained your I.Q. (if gotten from legitimate means) is 74 you are considered to be in the borderline range of intelligence.
p.s. - 50% of the population has an I.Q. at or lower than 100
2007-06-07 11:22:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by countbehavior 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I tried five different IQ tests.
The first one gave me 124.
The second gave me 132
The third dave me 110.
The fourth gave me 98.
The fifth gave me 140.
So , you can not say depend on IQ tests as a measure for your intelligence. Besides, don't forget that there are 7 types of intelligence according to Howard Gardner. Which are
linguistic, Logical-Mathematical , Bodily-Kinesthetic , Spatial , Musical , Interpersonal, & Intrapersonal.
So, your Logical-Mathematical IQ may be 160 for example while your Musical may be 98. When all kinds of intellegence are tested in the same test, it becomes so hard to specify your actuall abillity.
2007-06-07 18:46:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mimi 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes,Daniel, you're the only one.
We're sorry- it's just bad luck.
No sense in feeling sorry for yourself.
Perhaps you can be a cab driver.
We will continue to offer good thoughts.
Thank you for your question.
2007-06-07 19:47:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by sirbobby98121 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
165 IQ, sorry.
2007-06-07 17:09:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Papou 3
·
0⤊
4⤋