English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or was it neutral? I think it was neutral but I'm not sure and I need to know for a project!

2007-06-07 09:57:00 · 6 answers · asked by ♥Remy♥ 5 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

Sweden has always been a neutral country, even in WWII, though, like Switzerland, it had to make a few compromises : exporting iron ore to Germany, allowing the Wehrmacht to use Swedish railways to transport an infantry division from Norway to Finland, and to transport soldiers on leave between Norway and Germany, a large part of the Swedish merchant marine was leased to Britain, spying and codebreaking for the British.

2007-06-07 10:04:58 · answer #1 · answered by Erik Van Thienen 7 · 1 0

Sweden has remained neutral throughout the 20th century, and most of the 19th century. Sweden's last war was when it fought Napoleon, keeping him from invading...in 1814. However, during the 17th century (1600's) Sweden was a major European military power.

2007-06-07 12:52:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It was always neutral.

2007-06-07 10:14:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

till now I respond on your question, I in basic terms ought to make it clean that i admire usa and the yankee human beings customarily. i'm grateful for all allied protection tension workers, even with nationality, for their contributions in worldwide conflict 2. a million) sure, we lost the progressive conflict. no one is disputing that, and no one in Britain even cares. although, that's historic certainty that the French and Spanish helped the yankee revolutionaries. no one's making excuses, the British lost, however the French and Spanish (among others) have been in contact, you won't be in a position to easily deny that. 2) We did no longer lose the conflict of 1812. whilst combating Napoleonic France, Britain nonetheless carried out a number of protection tension victories against usa. finally, the conflict replaced right into a 'draw', with issues going back to how they have been in basic terms before the conflict. Oh, and in order that which you recognize, there's a place referred to as 'New England' interior america. that's abode to approximately fifteen million human beings. 3) Britain had already gained the conflict of england till now usa entered the conflict. This victory ended all wish of a German invasion of england, so, even devoid of American intervention, we does no longer be speaking German. i'm no longer asserting we could have gained the conflict devoid of usa, yet we does no longer have been invaded the two. The individuals made a extensive contribution throughout worldwide conflict 2, even however if everyone merits credit for defeating Hitler, truly that's the Russians. As I reported till now, i admire individuals, yet i don't experience the ought to 'thank usa', and by technique of no means you in my opinion. have you ever thanked England for the language you communicate? Or the easy regulation device, on which your legal device is predicated? have you ever thanked Britain for being relatively plenty the only considerable us of a to help your invasion of Iraq? of course no longer, and that i does no longer anticipate you to. Allies paintings mutually, we help one yet another out, yet, to be ordinary, your concepts-set isn't helping. usa and Britain share one in all these great courting, do no longer attempt and injury it by technique of being petty.

2016-12-12 14:28:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NEUTRAL

2007-06-07 10:37:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

are you sweedish?
ask the guy above

2007-06-07 10:06:16 · answer #6 · answered by AnswerIt 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers