The USA is simply bypassing the EU and dealing directly with Eastern European nations that want to maintain good relations with the United STates.
Given the fact that EU has become increasingly their own person in the face of the fast receeding and long lost history of World War two and the collapse of the USSR there is a greater need for the United States to foster new diplomatic ties in an area fast becoming not so friendly to the United States.
Notice that some of the first nations to sign onto the Coaliton of the willing was eastern European nations? This was not by accident and the USA took great notice of this. They immediately began strong efforts to forge ties that will replace a Western Europe that is becoming ever so slowly recalcitrant if not downright hostile to the policies of the United States.
This is why I propose the USA pull all forces out of Western Europe and make treaties with Eastern Europeans and put bases and facilities in those countries and help subsidize economies that are struggling. This should be done with Moscow’s blessing.
The problem is Putin Declared in Indonesia in 2003 that Russia was a Muslim Country and promised to be a major player on the world stage in the future. He is not kidding. This fact alone is why the USA must deal with Russia if they want to make in roads into the Muslim world in the Middle east and most particularly Iran.
So putting a missile shield in Poland. Goes way beyond putting a missile shield in Poland.
2007-06-07 09:56:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, because we're not going to give them the technology and they don't know how to build it since they haven't been working on it for 25 years like the US has. Plus, it's really a defense for the US, since missiles fired at the US would either have to come that way, or over the Pacific. So, if we're going to have a missile defense system, we might as well have it there and stop them earlier.
2007-06-07 09:57:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we were to not have a missle defense system then any country on this planet can bomb anyone with almost no regrets. Having a missle defense won't stop the button from being pushed but it will make them think twice before pushing it and if the button would be pushed then I can be certain that having protection will save lives even though alot will be taken in the process. Just imagine where we would be if terrorist could launch a nuclear missle into england then whose next? I welcome the idea of a missle system if it keeps those button pushing maniacs from blowing my kids and family up.
2007-06-07 10:43:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by RB. Johnson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is to shield Europe from a possible missile attack from Iran. Which is highly likely.
2007-06-07 09:55:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonnnn24424 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
The fact is that the US has been defending Europe for decades because they're too cheap to do it themselves.
2007-06-07 10:24:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by jdkilp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that it may be a ruse to actually bring offense weapons into new strategic positions.
2007-06-07 11:25:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
"human beings, this won't artwork, esp for international locations like Russia and China." particular it is going to artwork. a great number of it extremely is already in place. "Bush reported it replaced into for rouge international locations yet nevertheless, clouds of dummy missiles could desire to be released first to confuse the equipment." Wow! Didnt comprehend that! shall we no longer build it in any respect! That'll actually artwork plenty extra desirable! /sarcasm So, enable them to sling dummy missles. You dont think of that they havent taken that into attention? The equipment can shield dummy missles, and the genuine ones besides. "The equipment can constantly be fooled." they could try. after all, "the equipment could be fooled" isn't a solid argument for no longer development it. "BTW, i do no longer blame Russia one bit for being positioned off." I couldnt care much less approximately them being positioned off by potential of it. American national protection is none of their concern. I dont ask your self why they get disenchanted each time united statesa. tries to maintain itself defended. The greater we are in protecting ourselves, the extra they hate it. The extra weaker we are, the extra they like it. So who died and appointed them our guardians? because of the fact while can we could desire to ascertain with them and get their approval on how united statesa. defends herself? "The sytem could be used to attack besides." solid. "If Russia outfitted one in Cuba, the yanks could be all up in palms." No we wouldnt,. after all, in accordance to you, it wouldnt artwork. and we could be sending dummy missles to confuse the equipment in Cuba. :-) "you in basic terms take a seat returned and have faith something your Neo con conflict device tells you and you circulate alongside with it. " and you're a larger professional than the "conflict device", how?
2016-10-09 10:46:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
to intimidate the russians.
2007-06-07 11:34:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋