Good point! but in fact there was not a defacto winner of the war of Independence even though the Americans say they won.
In reality the British gave up went home because the cost of fighting the war of attrition in America was crippling !.- It drained rmen and resources from what was seen has a far more profitable and urgent campaign to kick the French out of India.
History shows that the British did kick the french out of India adding its wealth to the growing British empire!
which angered the french,, Iin retaliation the french sent troops to help the Americans ,
The rest is history!
2007-06-07 10:12:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by robert x 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Excellent point. The Americans have a tendency to forget the Hessian mercenaries King George sent from his native Germany, mad as a hatter he was at the time, and also the fact we were fighting massive wars in Europe- the whole American tantrum was but a storm in a tea-cup.
Had the French not blockaded the Channel, we would have soundly thrashed their insolent hides- and I suspect the world would be a better place for it too.
What of the land that the new Americans stole from the loyalists- who'd taken refuge over the border in Canada?
Methinks there may be an issue of compensation.
2007-06-07 12:57:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
About 1/3 of the troops used by the British during the American Revolution were Hessian. And they weren't mercenaries, they were conscripts.
2007-06-07 07:43:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was effectively a civil war. They were all technically British, until the separatists won. Lots of Americans fought to stay British - they were called "Tories". The war also saw some major atrocities committed by both sides.
2007-06-07 10:41:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
the main serious reason exchange into that there exchange into countless thousand miles from the place British troops have been coming to the place the conflict exchange into. the 2nd maximum serious factor exchange into that the U. S. exchange into waiting to get eu allies (France, Spain and the Netherlands) who for the 1st and purely time interior the 18th century controlled to realize some form of parity with the Royal army; which made it achievable for them to acquire community naval supremacy at some factors. Thirdly, as quickly as different Europeans grew to alter into in contact the British had different colonies that have been plenty extra substantial in terms of earnings like the west indies sugar island to guard. finally for the united kingdom the conflict exchange into militarily unwinnable, there exchange into no single city or section that if captured could reason a fall down interior the insurrection. the only armed forces decision could have been to have conquered each city village and hamlet interior the yankee colonies, something way previous the capacity of the British state on the time. nevertheless the conflict exchange into unwinnable in terms of armed forces effect if political compromise could have created a distinctive effect. there exchange into an substantial minority interior the united kingdom that had a large number of sympathy for the colonists from the commencing up too.
2016-12-18 17:00:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cornwallis wasn't a Hessian. The mercenaries were germans, but there were plenty of redcoats as well.The Americans had declared their independence, so I don't think they could be called British.
You could possibly argue that the French won the war, since it was their blockade that led to surrender.
2007-06-07 07:35:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by webned 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Irrelevant argument. The people fighting against the king were fighting to gain independence from the king. Once they won the war, they were no longer British.
2007-06-07 07:34:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
was it Cornwallis who surrendered at Yorktown? i think our British friends would not appreciate you calling him a German mercenary.
2007-06-07 07:37:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by jonny y 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually it was the Welsh..
(they don't like being called British in the least).
The Welsh actually own america, and they wrote and signed the constitution.
2007-06-07 07:34:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
well i dont no if thats true but since i am a brit al say ye it is lol
2007-06-07 07:32:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by lotti brockie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋