Paris Hilton out of jail with "health issues" ? what withdrawl symptoms ? I wonder if this would work for the rest of us ?
2007-06-07 05:25:22 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
What a Disgrace!! Health Issues my A*s!
She's been in there for three days whining & crying and her shrink has been with her for 2 hours each day.
Her problem is she couldn't be alone in her cell with a book for more than an hour without having seizures.
And you wonder if this would work for us, well let me clear that up for you H*ll NO!
2007-06-07 05:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by lightwriter 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Unofficial report sez she has nightmares about Freddie Kruger/the Nightmare on Elm Street movie killer,so the psyke sez she got to GET OUT of jail b4 she breaks down.AS of Sunday.PARIS wont SLEEP or eat/see Yahoo news article on homepage.
2007-06-10 00:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What precisely is being criminalized? Not bad driving. Not destruction of property. Not the taking of human life or reckless endangerment. The crime is having the wrong substance in your blood. Crime : Blood-alcohol 0.08 percent and above
What have we done by permitting government to criminalize the content of our blood instead of actions themselves? We have given it power to make the application of the law arbitrary, capricious, and contingent on the judgment of cops and cop technicians. Indeed, without the government's "Breathalyzer," there is no way to tell for sure if we are breaking the law.
drunk driving has to be illegal because the probability of causing an accident rises dramatically when you drink ? The answer is just as simple: government in a free society should not deal in probabilities. The law should deal in actions and actions alone, and only insofar as they damage person or property. Probabilities are something for insurance companies to assess on a competitive and voluntary basis.
Despite the propaganda, what's being criminalized in the case of drunk driving is not the probability that a person driving will get into an accident but the fact of the blood-alcohol content itself. A drunk driver is humiliated and destroyed even when he hasn't done any harm. And please don't write me to say: "I am offended by your insensitivity because my mother was killed by a drunk driver." Any person responsible for killing someone else is guilty of manslaughter or murder and should be punished accordingly. But it is perverse to punish a murderer not because of his crime but because of some biological consideration, e.g. he has red hair.
In the same way, drunk drivers cause accidents but so do sober drivers, and many drunk drivers cause no accidents at all. The law should focus on violations of person and property, not scientific oddities like blood content.
There's a final point against Clinton's drunk-driving bill. It is a violation of states rights. Not only is there is no warrant in the Constitution for the federal government to legislate blood-alcohol content – the 10th amendment should prevent it from doing so.
2007-06-07 12:59:09 · answer #3 · answered by MIkE ALEGRIA 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
God, do you have children? Knowing that drinking impares driving ability, wouldn't you feel safer as a parent knowing that hopefully, due to the law, not as many people out on the streets are impared?
2007-06-07 18:56:28 · answer #4 · answered by Heidi K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why are you attacking Paris Hilton? It's the legal system that's at fault. I'm sure if it was anyone of us in jail we would expect our lawyer to do what ever he could to get us out. Do you really think the Hilton's could change the law?
2007-06-07 12:48:24 · answer #5 · answered by Mister Bald 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋
All i have to say is what a ****** princess, seems like the system only cares for rich and famous. F U C K THEM ALL.
2007-06-07 19:12:42 · answer #6 · answered by Stel 1 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Oooo, thats mean. Arent we supposed to let these celebrities keep some of their private issues out of the newspapers\? Lets be kind, there is diarrhea, PMS, and other maladies of the bodily function types that should be kept private.
2007-06-07 12:35:42 · answer #7 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Apparently she wasn't eating the jail food and those were her "medical considerations."
Pfft. Not eating didn't get Gandhi out of jail.
2007-06-07 12:49:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes Sia, I think YOU could.
We dont know what the medical problem is. But im sure people have been able to serve their time else where when one does arrise.
2007-06-07 12:36:22 · answer #9 · answered by Kandy 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Thats whats wrong with our legal system. We have rules for the rich and other rules for regular people.
2007-06-07 12:35:15 · answer #10 · answered by M R 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋