Would you rather be extremely wealthy but not be able to make contact with your friends and family or constantly have your family but always have financial burdens that cause you to work 2 jobs for the rest of your life?
2007-06-07 05:09:52 · 10 answers · asked by Juldog 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
No point in having money if you can't spend time with those you love. And, if you've never had money, you won't know what you're missing. However, if you've had loved ones, you'll know exactly what you're missing.
2007-06-07 08:40:11 · answer #1 · answered by Melly Flutter 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money cannot buy happiness, friends or love so I would rather be broke but surrounded by friends and family
2007-06-07 17:02:00 · answer #2 · answered by Gemini 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I already pretty much work 2 jobs, and I'm happy with my friends and family so I'll go that route...what's the point of having money if you have no one to enjoy it with?
2007-06-07 12:17:48 · answer #3 · answered by baby_girl_1219 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I've done the second all my life so it would be nice to try the first for my last few remaining years.
2007-06-07 14:03:23 · answer #4 · answered by quatt47 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Try attaching monetary value to the joy and satisfaction of seeing your friends and family members and the assurance of knowing they are always there for you even if sometimes only to fight with and ask this question again.
2007-06-07 12:55:41 · answer #5 · answered by Strotte 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Very hard choice, I think, but family is more important...
2007-06-07 16:29:03 · answer #6 · answered by Eskimo Hammer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd take the wealth, then buy new friends and family.
2007-06-07 13:38:53 · answer #7 · answered by Krusty 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
is there a nother choice like: Being f'en rich with all famliy and friends!
2007-06-07 13:05:10 · answer #8 · answered by mOnTy 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Give me the loot!
2007-06-07 15:28:25 · answer #9 · answered by Mongo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
See you later folks
2007-06-07 12:12:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋