In the news recently. See the Yahoo news item (and related linked stories) below:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/po/20070605/co_po/surgeongeneralnomineeantigaybias
Does the Prez come up with these nominees out of personal conviction or just to stir up enough ruckus to distract people from real issues for which he has no answers? (Not that he would be the first President to use this tactic).
2007-06-07 04:34:57 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Refresh my memory, which party's president fired the Surgeon General just for recommending masturbation as a form of safe sex?
2007-06-07 05:35:31 · update #1
since the HRC has spoken against this person, I would suspect he will not be approved.
2007-06-07 04:43:10 · answer #1 · answered by Tegarst 7 · 8⤊ 0⤋
i assumed that he had already claimed this homophobic nonsense, i found a link although for interpreting Edit: Unnatural plus the non secular lies could be disproved via the 2d and third link that i found. It became right into a bad option to place the question right here as you we are continually extra probable to get some homophobic non secular people replying 2d edit: The president and his allies are all non secular homophobes so it incredibly isn't any ask your self that he's be enjoying to the ignorant and the hateful
2016-11-26 22:51:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did some research on him, not much just a quick scan, and he is definitely a distraction. A dangerous one if our Commander in Chief misplays his cards.
In addition to being anti-partofthehumanpopulation, he appears to be a religious fanatic. (No, I've no issue with religion. It's the fanatics who scare me)
I don't know how bad the real nominee will turn out to be, but if this guy is the distraction, it must be one corrupt person indeed.
peace :D
2007-06-07 05:17:55 · answer #3 · answered by Threshin 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Typical Bush appointment with agenda of bigot just waht we need as the Surgeon General.
2007-06-07 08:11:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am always surprised that people that lack a progressive agenda get into office or nominated for that matter. Shows you how backwards & out of touch the US has become. The US is hardly a world leader anymore as they are more of a bully.
It's embarrassing.
2007-06-07 04:55:58 · answer #5 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Michaelangelo Signorile thinks it's a poo pot stirrer, but nevertheless has recommended that we call Sen. Kennedy's office, even though we're sure he's well aware of the "madness" of the decision and won't likely let him in. If you listen to Signorile or hit his blogspot, he keeps us all well updated on OutQ.
_()_
2007-06-07 04:58:19 · answer #6 · answered by vinslave 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yea, he should more compasionate like Clinton. Remember he's the one that put "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and "The Defence of Marriage Act" into law.
Face it dude, neither party wants you.
2007-06-07 05:21:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He's a quack.
I'd be worried a bit more except I am sure he won't be confirmed.
2007-06-07 05:00:30 · answer #8 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush keeps confirming he is a real idiot
2007-06-07 04:47:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Keep contacting your Senators, y'all.
2007-06-07 04:48:36 · answer #10 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋