English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Sure she did and most everyone knew she would. Yes the public should be outraged the question is, what good would it do???? As I posted earlier, it just proves that there are two sets of laws, one for the rich and one for the poor.

2007-06-07 03:51:08 · answer #1 · answered by shirley e 7 · 4 0

Yes, the American public should be extremely outraged by the action of the courts.

Paris Hilton volunteered to go to jail a day early for a crime she had commited and serve her 23 day stint.

Massachusetts has the second highest rate of wrongful incarceration in America and people here have done 20 and 30 years in prison for no crime commited, yet Ms. Hilton gets to go home. We need: http://www.jail4judges.org

2007-06-07 03:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Of course Paris got preferential treatment! The sheriff's office was ready to get rid of her ASAP as they would have had to inspect EVERY cell phone camera leaving the building (not to mention the problem of easily removable media cards). In fact, it appears that the sheriff's office violated the law and the judge's order to get rid of her ASAP. Remember, ultimately the POLICE serve justice. An uninforced law or the decision to arrest someone who is driving on suspension lies in their hands - not in the Judge's. The Judge in this case specifically ordered that Paris would not serve it from home, but ultimately, the police officers CHOSE to violate this order.

I doubt anyone other than celebrities receives completely respectful and professional treatment from any law enforcement agency. How did she get out of driving on suspension TWICE before they took her in? I feel like I have been on the other spectrum where I have received in-equal treatment and although I am a law-abiding citizen, I have received poor treatment from 97% of my encounters with the police and law enforcement.

I think police and law enforcement abuse their power frequently, except in cases like Paris, when they know people are watching. A side word of advice: carry a small voice recorder with you in your car that you can record every encounter with the police on the road. It is perfectly legal and keeps officers on their best behavior and prevents them from lying later in court.

2007-06-07 15:44:53 · answer #3 · answered by Byron B 2 · 0 0

Yes, it is ture Paris Hilton has been released but the County would have put any inmate with certain medical conditions on house arrest versus incarceratoin. Less liability and less costly. Just like they routinely reduce sentences for good behavior.
The only difference is that her house arrest is in a HUGE mansion and not an apartment next to a crack dealer.

Also, please note that she served 3 days out of 23 so instead of 20 days in jail she is under house arrest for 40 days. I dont know about all of you but I would find it difficult to stay home for 40 days. I would have preferred to do the 20 locked up.

2007-06-07 03:52:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Absolutely!!!!!! What the public should do is not give her the attention that she craves and just ignore her. What is she anyway, just a spoiled rich girl with too much time on her hands. When she decides to grow up and do something productive with her life, such as helping the homeless or the enviroment, then I'll pay attention again.

2007-06-07 03:56:42 · answer #5 · answered by WVPV07 4 · 3 0

Yes to both questions. At her age (26), she needs to start becoming more mature and taking responsibility for her dumb actions. I'm definitely outraged. I'm tired of seeing her stupidity on public display. Maybe she will be her own demise one day.

2007-06-07 04:08:03 · answer #6 · answered by Tinkerbell 4 · 0 0

Doesn't the jail have an Infirmary? Or a doctor?

Would you or I have gotten out because we were ill? I doubt it!

Just another example of the rich buying their way out of jail.

Just another example of California Justice. The term is an oxymoron.
-

2007-06-07 04:01:38 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

confident, i think of it fairly is with the aid of the fact it contraptions a precedent for particular therapy of celebrities. If a conventional guy with a dui and probation violation became sent to detention center and harm his back, he'd be sent to the detention center infirmary, no longer back to the hollywood hills. The sheriff overstepped and became out of his rights in freeing her. they're making her pass back to court docket to be certain if she has to pass back to detention center for something of her sentence, and that i think of that could be the proper step. i think of it slow on my own for her to think of and mirror could be good for her besides.

2016-11-07 20:26:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes and Yes. Hope I helped!

2007-06-07 03:53:49 · answer #9 · answered by *Scandinavian Sweetheart* 4 · 2 0

i just might write to the LA police, and let them know ive lost all repect for them... she could have killed somebody...

2007-06-07 04:01:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers