do you think that the bush administration carried out the 9/11 terrorist attacks and if so, why?

Question

with more and more conspiracy theories coming to light, what do you think

i am not suggesting that they did, and for what it matters, i DO NOT think that they did. i am asking for your opinion, if you can not answer objectivly then why bother?

i have watched 9/11 in plane sight and to be honest there is nothing in it that has made me change my view. the "explosions" lower down the buildings as they collapsed are quite strange (more terrorists inside?) and i do think there is a case for wtc7 - there were probably a lot of secret stuff in there that the administration didn't want everyone to know, however the government have said that they destroyed that building, so i don't see how you can argue that if they destroyed that then they destroyed wtc.

fair point FOO
what i meant to say was if you cant answer without having a go at me, then don't bother.
i stand corrected

Answer 1

Right.......and they were responsible for Katrina also..WRONG!!!!

Answer 2

They had very poor emergency procedures after planes went awol....ground staff didnt know what to do.,...

what would have happened if they had an aircraft which had lost communciation and control???I am sure air traffic control has procedures....

It is possible that the security staff new what this might possibly be about and rather han take responsibility for blowing own american jet airliners out of the sky they may have just let them hit their targets...

Alot of this is about procedure and whether there were any?
The abscent of them makes sense of the situation but I dont think they had no procedures.?

This type of scenario was developed in th 1990s to show the devastation a plane attack could have on the city...

Answer 3

I don't think the Bush administration was behind it, but I think at the very least they LET it happen. Bush was warned months in advance yet did nothing. Plus they have gained immeasurably as the result of the attacks.

I suggest watching '9/11 in Plane Site' with an open mind, and see what conclusions you come to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7zp-08Axi8

Answer 4

Bush had no more to do with carrying out 9/11 than Bill Clinton had with bombing the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City or the bombing of one of the towers in NYC in '92. Its not about logic, its about hate for this president. If Al Gore had been president on 9/11, these conspiracy nuts would be doing something else today. Come to think of it, most of them probably think Gore was president - so why are they all over Bush?

Answer 5

I think this will answer your question

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

I quote:

"Whatever reason it may be that the government supposedly orchestrated this conspiracy, it must have been worth it to them to cause so much suffering and loss of life. So if there's any truth to this, then you can bet your *** that the government wouldn't let a couple of pecker-neck chumps with a couple of Macs and too much time on their hands jeopardise their entire operation by letting stupid videos float around on the Internet."

You didn't ask for an objective answer, you asked what we thought, i.e. our opinions. So you got them. Perhaps in the future, if you spent less time on conspiracy theories and more time checking what you had actually written you'd get more satisfying answers.

Answer 6

No, but they knew bin Laden was determined to strike the US and that an attack using airplanes was imminent. Yet they did nothing. A possible reason was that they wanted an attack to happen so that they could begin their agenda of "spreading democracy" in the middle east. However, they did not know the details of the attack nor is it likely that they anticipated the severity.

Answer 7

Assuming that he did, the reason would be to fuel the Neo-con agenda and even if he did most Americans rather not know it or ignore it. The fact that the government or the president could do something like that is a pill that most don't want to swallow. They rather stay safe in the matrix.





http://youtube.com/watch?v=8w_aT6L44Mg&mode=related&search=

Answer 8

Yes I totally believe that himself and others around him were invloved. For the main reason of the profits to be gained from the no bid contracts and of course the Oil. Greed will drive people to do anything.

Answer 9

the full usa observed the two airplane hit the towers stay. there became into adequate time as quickly as they took off and ensuing activities to furnish television crews time to hint the airplane. there became right into an excellent type of turmoil that day, and an excellent type of 2d guessing as to basically what occurred and the place. on an identical time as I do have questions approximately basically what did ensue, incredibly on the Pentagon, i think of your conclusions are very plenty off course.

Answer 10

No! The Bush admin has cocked up a lot of things over Iraq I f they has actually planned it I would suggest they would have made a better job of their reaction

Answer 11

No. If the government planned it, to, say, have an excuse for going to War/erode civil liberties, they could have attacked a target like the Statue of Liberty. There's no way they'd have willingly destroyed a centre of business, the attacks are believed to have cost the economy billions. Not our military-industrial complex.