2007-06-07 00:42:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It's just a coincidence I'm sure. Most larger cities like New York seem to attract those who lean to the left. While concervatives seem to like to live in less populated areas. But it's not that big a difference. Interesting thought though.
2007-06-07 00:54:16 · answer #1 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Dawg, never considered it. Sounds like you are pigeon holing a group when it is a bi-partisan issue. Attacks on innocent people are world wide and not particularly selective of which party they favor. More they select target areas to make profound news and statements. Some for religious reasons as opposed to political. Good attempt at something, I can't exactly figure out what it is you are reaching for with this question?
2007-06-07 01:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lmao! thats like saying ketchup targets french fries. i agree with the previous poster that a verifiable source to confirm such an accusation is needed. Farenheit 9/11 movie is not a source.
p.s. im not affiliated with democrats, republicans or any other political party. im just a realist.
2007-06-07 00:57:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I disagree. There are not large numbers of Democrats working in the Pentagon.
2007-06-07 00:53:52 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
New York is the media center so it is a natural target. Outside of that our embassies and military are bastions of Democrats?
2007-06-07 01:00:57 · answer #5 · answered by Tom Sh*t 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, The USS Cole probably had very few in it. They love Democrats.
2007-06-07 00:50:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wonder if the people in the Pentagon and the Twin Towers feel that same way.
2007-06-07 01:43:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million. They have been pardoned on the promise that they denounce FALN and their ideals and activities. in the event that they have been so dependable to the reason, they does no longer have taken considered one of those deal, and remained martyrs. yet howdy, what do i comprehend? 2. so which you will carry 1960's ideals against a individual?? the guy inspired the strikes, he by no potential carried them out. he's not extra to blame than i'm for believing that everybody with an opposing point of view is stupid (it incredibly is my conceitedness, and not something extra). study slightly on your historic previous. Me? I married a historic previous professor. He ought to sit down down and clarify all the info to you like he does to me. . . 3. Out of context. positioned the full quote, and the context wherein it replaced into spoken. 4. Out of context. positioned the full quote, and the context wherein it replaced into spoken. 5. till you supplies a "terrorist" objective, all it incredibly is is what they're asserting - an incident of a loopy individual capturing those they artwork with simply by fact of a few form of psychological instability. you're making this assertion simply by fact of your ignorant perspectives in direction of Muslims. "in the event that they're Muslim, they're terrorists". that may no longer the certainty. it would be irresponsible to report that if there is not any info of it being real. 6. And them getting those situations thrown out is as simply by Bush and his goons. in the event that they might have accompanied technique and the regulation (i comprehend - in simple terms clouding the situation with info), we does no longer be having this dialogue, might we?? I additionally ought to pass on and on, yet you've gotten your view, and that i could have mine. yet i might fairly preserve somebody's precise to freedom of speech and preserve a terrorist than to disclaim everybody the rights assured by utilising the form and stay in a rustic that ought to lock me up simply by fact of my very own perspectives. And it incredibly is those that think of like me that enable those that think of such as you to have the skill to particular your perspectives freely with out concern of reprisal from the government. so which you will disagree with me in case you so p.c., yet do no longer accuse me of being criminal or loving our u . s . a . any decrease than you simply by fact i do no longer share your political ideals. it incredibly is immature and a unfavourable thank you to communicate your perspectives as maximum appropriate and mine as incorrect.
2017-01-10 17:45:49 · answer #8 · answered by porro 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's 'cause conservatives are smart enogh to get the hell outta there! JK.
2007-06-07 02:39:18 · answer #9 · answered by KJLONG 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would the Terrorists kill their own Comrades??
LOL
2007-06-07 00:57:21 · answer #10 · answered by Samm 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋