Does String Theory relate To Carezani's Relativity Pico-graviton?

Answer 1

First, Matt Pang does not understand AD at all. Autodynamics equations simply state that movement requires energy and it cannot be ignored. Newton and Einstein assumed movement was there and did not take it into account. So whereas people say the AD equations predict wrongly everyday events or are superficial, they do not understand the simple concept of particple propellant. Mass decreases because for any mass to move on its own, energy has to be spent and since energy and mass are the same, mass must be used. Again, this simple concept is misunderstood and mistaught by people such as Matt. People simply think they can understand something like Autodynamics in a few hours and it takes years to understand.

To answer the original question, strings are an admitted invention that tries to backward engineer the entirety of the universe whereas the pico-graviton is trying to describe a mechanism only for gravity. The graviton is not new, simply Carezani's Autodynamics points in the direction of a universe powered by the constant change of energy into mass and mass into energy and so the pico-graviton is the graviton inspired by the mistakes Carezani found in Einstein's (really Lorentz) and the new directions that Carezani's equation have shown. Pico-gravitons are mass and since all mass is energy, the pico-graviton is absorbed by mass and increase very very slightly over time. This also fits the Autodynamic world described by Carezani's equations.

Where strings have n dimensions, pico-gravitons only work in a 3-dimensional world.

To answer the original

Answer 2

Carezani's work predicts length and time contractions which superficially look similar to relativity's but give totally unrealistic quantative predictions. It predicts such effects on noticable on day to day scales, such as cars or aeroplanes. Obviously length dilation is not noticable at speeds vehicles can reach, yet autodynamics predicts such effects.

It also says the neutrino doesn't exist. It's a proven fact that it does. Carezani claims it's all down to experimental error but considering the enormous amount of evidence from many experiments carried out by thousands of scientists from around the globe, it's very naive to think they ALL made exactly the same error which behaves in a consistent way!

String theory as a theory to everything would technically relate to everything. The original string theory can only explain a few types of hadrons. Superstring theory incorporates supersymmetry which has the spin 2 massless gravitons .

Answer 3

11 dimensional string theory, (and 26 dimensional M theory), has not produced anything.

It is possible that the extra 7 dimensions of space in string theory, (that are not perceived), are mathematical deception. This mathematical deception first appeared with 5 dimensional Kaluza-Klein Theory.

String theory is possibly deception, derived from adding dimensions of space to the already existing 3 dimensions of space one dimension at a time at 90 degree angles to the previous dimension.

That string theory is possibly invalid is stated at the end of the wikipedia article on string theory.

Answer 4

evaluate the time it takes to combine the climate and bake the brownies. The time varies with what proportion bran brownies you should make, besides via fact the size of the brownies. That pronounced, bran brownies will improve in mass as they approach mild velocity and settlement fairly than boost. See my previous remark on the sci notation of the bran muffin. .