what is the definition of scientific principle?

Question

please answer me , and don't give a link....

Answer 1

One that is testable for consistency by performing an experiment. You can never prove anything absolutely this way, but you must be able to disprove it if it is wrong.

Answer 2

Scientific Principle Definition

Answer 3

Sound Science Definition

Answer 4

1) Why should we believe young earth Creationists, when they show ignorance of even basic scientific principles? Well - you shouldn't believe Young Earth Creationists **regarding science** when they display ignorance of even basic scientific principles. That doesn't mean that you should disregard them in other areas of knowledge, though - for example, because one YECer is ignorant of science does not mean that you should not believe him when he tells you his name or his place of birth or that it is snowing where he lives. 2) it is, in summary, a summary of data, that has NO evidence proving it incorrect (sigh) False. This is *NOT* the definition of a scientific theory. Should I now disbelieve you, since you have proven yourself ignorant of even basic scientific principles? 3) However, in my experience with global warming deniers, they don’t know this definition. I can understand why. 4) They believe that, one day, a theory will “graduate” to be a scientific law when it gets enough evidence, when in fact this is not the case at all. A false claim. This is, at times, the case. "This is not the case at all" ignores the very, very many instances when a scientific theory *has* "graduated" and become known as a "law". 5) Theories explain “why” things happen, and laws explain “how” (Which is why we have both a theory AND law of gravity) Yikes! First, this is not true of either theories or laws. Many (most) scientific theories explain how things happen. Second, there is currently no "theory of gravity". There is, instead, a theory of **gravitation**. However - there ONCE WAS a scientific "theory of gravity" - and that theory, once proved, became a scientific law. 6) So how can you expect us to listen to your claims, such as “there is no scientific evidence for evolution” when you don’t even know the basic principles of science? Irony is fun. Don't you think irony is fun? 7) not as someone who has a misunderstanding of a definition the rest of us learned in middle school? Wow. What middle school? I want to make sure that my children never end up there. 8) I mean, assuming a scientist actually found evidence for young earth creationism, as you claim. At his nomination speech for the dozen or so noble peace prizes he will win for proving practically every scientist on earth wrong, he will say something like “evolution is ONLY a theory”, and be automatically discredited, because that makes just as much sense as saying “relativity (which we have already proven scientifically) is ONLY a theory” Ouch, ouch OUCH! This hits close to home. The theory of relativity has not only not been proved, it has (in fact) been proved to be **faulty**. Physicists KNOW that the theory of relativity is flawed. Not only is the theory of relativity "only a theory", it is a theory **known and widely recognized** to be a flawed theory. Please, please PLEASE - return to middle-school - a DIFFERENT middle school - that teaches basic science principles instead of basic misinformation. Jim

Answer 5

The scintific principle was set forth first by Archimedes by first developping a theory on the Basis of an experiment.
Later Galileo Developed a theory of motion by doing an experiment.
So the Scientific method is the principle used in science=You see a problem ,you do a test,you obtain a result,draw a conclusion from the result.

Answer 6

This is the explanation we learned at the University of Rochester.
The scientific method is the process by which scientists, collectively and over time, endeavor to construct an accurate (that is, reliable, consistent and non-arbitrary) representation of the world.
Recognizing that personal and cultural beliefs influence both our perceptions and our interpretations of natural phenomena, we aim through the use of standard procedures and criteria to minimize those influences when developing a theory.


It basically states that in order to take our personal biases and beliefs out of the observation we perform to discover natural laws, we will follow a prescribed 5-step process that is repeatable by many different scientists all over the world with the same result.
Also, the results will stand the test of time.

Answer 7

Interesting topic!

Answer 8

Balalaika I don t care. Lolololololololololol

Answer 9

to see is to know. everything assumed must be proven by (repeatable) perceivable facts.