http://www.flickr.com/photos/eekay/509004472/in/set-72157600240223259/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eekay/508195950/in/set-72157600240223259/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eekay/510892070/in/set-72157600240223259/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eekay/510892168/in/set-72157600240223259/
NOW THESE LINKS CAN LINK YOU TO THE WEBPAGE. I NEED YOUR QUICK RESPONSE PLZ. THANKS
2007-06-06 19:23:37 · 7 answers · asked by adi 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
No no i'd say more of a colin farell or josh hartnett
and he is pretty cute.
2007-06-06 19:27:16 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first photo is hot. Second is good. Third is average to good. Last one is an average guy. Way way better than Tom Cruise. Not really into Leo and a completely different look than Brad Pitt. I would say comparable to Orlando Bloom in the first photo
2007-06-06 20:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by Tina C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Cruise- a million-no longer something in any respect captivating bout him. Bradd Pitt-2-commencing off to look a splash tough,too many little ones will do it. Leo D-10.5-the older he gets the extra effectual looking he's.
2016-11-26 21:53:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he's average looking, but he's probably smarter than Brad Pitt.
Not as handsome as Leonardo.
Not as rich as Tom Cruise.
2007-06-06 23:38:47 · answer #4 · answered by sister_godzilla 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He looks really hot and hotter than the stars you have compared with.
I would rate him 94.75% better than the stars.
Brad pitt - 1
Leonardo- 2
Tom cruise- 3
2007-06-06 19:32:17 · answer #5 · answered by scarlet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Amanda, more of a Collin Farrell.
But thats not a bad thing:)
2007-06-06 20:48:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
omg.. that dude is down right *hot* and *sexy*
2007-06-08 02:58:40 · answer #7 · answered by Dancychikchik 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋