English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

If it's a question of ethics then it depends on the age of the child. If we're taking about a 3 year old runner then I don't think it would be unethical. If we're talking about a 16 year old...you just have to trust them, they deserve trust, respect nad some degree of privacy. Plus, if you can track your child with it who is to say someone else couldn't hack into it and track them. It's one if those things that seems like a good idea but could back fire.

2007-06-06 18:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by Dawn-Marie 5 · 0 0

Sure, it might save a lot of children from great harm from molesters and/or murderers, or if the child walks off alone like they seem to do a lot. I think that at 18, it should be removed. But then again, that's up to the person, that poor girl Kelsey Smith in KC was 18, just graduated high school and was found murdered and they found her by her cell phone, but they were too late. If she had GPS they might have saved her. I guess for me, I don't think it should be law, but a individual choice and a good idea

2007-06-06 18:48:09 · answer #2 · answered by another brick in the wall 3 · 0 0

I am sure there are many parents of missing children that wish they would have had that choice...I think that as long as your child is in full consent and it's removed by a certain age...maybe there wouldn't be anything wrong with it...so long as it's not used to find out where they are at all times but for safety reasons and if they have a tendency to lie to you about there whereabouts, you can check up on them or find them when they're late.

2007-06-06 18:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not in my opinion. But I think the time will come very soon that our govenment will be implanting them in everyone. Some criminals will be the first and then everyone. But then I'm one of those "nuts" who sees the erosion of freedom and American democracy as an indication that the US will eventually become a fascist state.

2007-06-06 18:45:17 · answer #4 · answered by Charlie P 4 · 1 0

implants, no. but i hired there was at least one company making watches and other clothing with GPS so parents could keep an eye on where there kids are.

2007-06-06 18:48:20 · answer #5 · answered by luphawk 2 · 0 0

Oh that just sucks!!! I could not imagine lodging something in my child to keep track of them. But then again...If they came up missing that would help too. Tough call.

2007-06-06 18:43:44 · answer #6 · answered by ♥Kimchi♥ 4 · 0 0

Cada vez que he necesitado un GPS para una actividad en especial me lo he comprado de sitios web y siempre he acertado. Cuando decidimos hacer una excursión a la montaña he comprado un GPS especial para esto, la entrega ha sido en el plazo cosa muy buena y el GPS lo he utilizado desde el segundo día, una compra muy buena porque el GPS es de gran ayuda, te enseña exactamente los opciones de camino y puedes visualizar antes el camino que has elegido, una buena compra de un buen producto.

2014-12-13 17:12:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In 5 years time it will be a viable option

2007-06-06 19:18:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, it's too much like the mark of the beast! But, I do think it would prove helpful in the event of a kidnapping or even putting one in your pet!

2007-06-06 18:43:06 · answer #9 · answered by Call me-C-4-Curious- 6 · 0 0

Sure,, he's your child and you have all the right to do what ever you think that could help raising him

2007-06-06 18:41:50 · answer #10 · answered by Abood 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers