I know a bunch of girls who are having babies in their teens. What do you think is a good age to have children

Answer 1

I think over 21 is best. Teenage bodies aren't physically ready yet for producing children. It can stunt certain types of development in teenagers. It's better to have a committed partner or husband. It's A LOT of work and once you are a parent, you are a parent for the rest of your life. I work with someone who was pregnant as a teenager. Now she is fighting for child support with her ex-boyfriend, never finished high school, and now wants badly to go out and have fun with her friends but she can't because she has a daughter who will be in the first grade in a couple of months. All her extra money and free time is spent on her daughter. I don't know one teenage mother who didn't feel she missed out on all the fun stuff in her late teens and early twenties.

Answer 2

My "plan" was to have my first baby at the age of 22-23. You know, my boyfriend and I would both be out of college by that time and getting started on steady careers, and we'd have been married for a year or two or three (we've been together since I was 15). So in my master plan in my mind, that was when we were going to get started with babymaking. However, I got pregnant on the pill (taking it correctly every day at the same time, I might add) at the age of 18. I am now 19 and 24 weeks pregnant. Sometimes you can't plan things, and sometimes things are meant to happen a certain way in your life. I certainly wish that I could have been married and through with college by the time I got pregnant, and I never would have purposely gotten pregnant at this age, but in the end your maturity and the stability of your relationship are much more important that how many years you've been on the earth. Some people might possibly be mature enough at 18...other might not meet the requirement until 35. It depends on your values and what you want out of life. Some people want to travel or be CEO of a major company. I want to be a mommy. It's happenning a little sooner than I'd planned, but I don't feel I'm missing anything besides a few more years of getting drunk and losing brain cells like most of my friends are still doing.

Answer 3

i think anything younger than 23 and you're missing out on so much. you get to experience so much more with so many less limitations. you don't need to worry about another person while you're still growing into yourself. once you decide to have kids, that's it, the next 18 or so years of your life you have to be devoted to putting someone else's needs and wants above your own. i know i was definitely not mature enough to handle that before now (im 26 and pregnant for the first time)

Answer 4

I was 18 when I got pregnant with my son. I don't really think it has to do with age, but more so with maturity level. I am 21, almost 22 and hubby and I are expecting our second, a girl, in September.

Answer 5

i could propose which you motivate the different families to hold their toddlers, and chop up the time up between activities all and sundry can do at the same time (for occasion, a picnic or BBQ, cake, swimming, a extremely easy interest of Pictionary, etc.) and activities the toddlers can do on an identical time as the adults communicate and socialize, so the toddlers do no longer lose interest. reckoning on the place you're having it, you could enable them to play on the playground, play outdoors video games like tag or seize the Flag, play indoor video games like Clue or tornado, or perhaps do a definite cool artwork undertaking which you have have been given gotten factors for. Making it an person party would be awkward in terms of activities. i could propose making it suited for each age, yet no longer insisting that the toddlers be with the adults the full time (although of direction they could desire to be supervised on an identical time as they play.) Nor could desire to the 9-365 days-previous they have observed be the lone toddler on the form, or she'll sense out of place, lonely, and bored. If the adults are desperate to play video games, you could continually basically carry Scrabble or Trivial Pursuit. i think of attempting to play "bathe-type" video games could be a splash weird and wonderful for all in contact, incredibly the youngster. And undergo in ideas, the adults very nicely could desire to dangle out and chat, so i would not push the video games concern until people look quite prepared to do it. I strongly 2d the advice which you think of of it as a party, incredibly than a bathtub. Showers concentration on the mothers and fathers, and on an identical time because it is high quality for an toddler, it incredibly is weird and wonderful for a toddler sufficiently previous to be attentive to what's going on. objective for party, which makes a speciality of the full kinfolk. suited of success. :-)

Answer 6

According to my doctor most women's bodies are not ready to carry a baby until they are 21. Beyond that I think that a good age is when you are financially and mentally stable, with lots of family support.

Answer 7

It has more to do with maturity than age, I think. But girls shouldn't have them too young because their bodies aren't yet fully developed.

I guess the short answer is - the best time is when you are married!

Answer 8

It depends on maturity level. People should try not to have kids before they finish school (college or high school). But i had my kid at 15 and i am doing great now, and i finished college and have a good job, it just depends on the person.

Answer 9

In ur 30's for real is best when u got ur career straight u r happily married n u know in ur heart is time that u want to have a child. So my advice to u is wait n wait n enjoy ur life.

Answer 10

when married and one spouse has a steady income to support the baby!