What kind of question is that? One does not have to do with the other. And I consider myself leaning to Pro-life. Pro-choise has more to do with maternity rights to a pregnancy and the governments right to put laws with it.
Pedofilia is a whole other sick and twisted thing.
2007-06-06 09:31:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Here in Phoenix there is a teacher that had a "sexual relationship" with a 16 year old boy and another 17 year old (that eventually turned 18). Of course the conservatives and many parents got angry about it but the media and libbies called it a relationship!!! They didn't even identify the boy as a victim (lucky but still a victim). The media here has a hard left slant and of course loves illegals, pro-choicers and the likes.
Statutory rape should be questioned if it's a 17 year old and an 18 year old.
Pedophilia....ewwwww. I don't even want to think about that!
2007-06-06 17:04:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question reminds me of the cop who asked his father, "How many times did you beat mom today?" leading and irrelevant.
It's the same as assuming that "Pro-Life" members are opposed to executions, war, DNR orders and anything else that would give a person the right to select how they live their lives.
If you want to lump people on one side of an issue into a dank and dark barrel, then do the same for all sides.
But, for the moment, let's assume that there is such a thing as a "PRO-Choice" group (although the label, as is Pro-Life labels, has no relevance). Do you honestly want this forum to believe that you would give up your right to determine what, if anything, and who, if anyone, has the right to control your body?
Are you saying that you would welcome the "Body" police into your home to insure that you have ONLY 1.5 children, are using the "Legally Correct" contraceptive or that you and your husband didn't miss your "Partner-swapping" party?
A man cannot be forced to have a vasectomy just as a woman cannot be forced to have an abortion.
A man has the right to decide to have a vasectory just as a woman has a right to have an abortion.
Or are you claiming to be a sexist and allow men dominion over their bodies and not women. Isn't a sperm a living organism just as is the egg?
When you start making theoretical arguments then you don't have the right which facts are presented. They are all part of the discussion.
So, not to your exact question. It doesn't deserve an answer. Just as if I asked, "Do Pro"Lifers" also support letting Hitler, Ted Bundy or the man who raped and killed your child to escape the death penalty? After all, none of us have the "CHOICE" to kill right? Isn't that what Pro-Life is all about?
EDITED TO ADD:
Just so you and everyone else reading this knows, I ABHORE abortion. However, as an attorney and a civil right's activist from the 60s and 70s, I will stand before the water cannons to protect a woman's choice. Just don't expect me to like that choice.
2007-06-06 16:51:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by hexeliebe 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
John Galt: The words "right to life" are NOT in the Constitution.
Would the self-appointed Constitutional Law scholars, who cannot tell the difference between the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, kindly shut the **** up about Constitutional rights? Thank you.
Okay, I lost my temper there. But really, can you blame me? Folks, please -- for the love of GOD -- or just common sense or whatever you believe in or love -- PLEASE, I BEG YOU -- if you confuse the US Constitution with the Declaration of Independence, you have no business discussing either (or lecturing people about rights, for that matter.) Go read a book, John, it'll do you good.
Asker: "If people werent sticking body parts where they didnt belong, we wouldnt have this debate in the first place." Nice. So, pregnancy results from sticking body parts where they don't belong? Very nice. You must be one of those people who believe sex is "unnatural".
2007-06-06 17:40:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rеdisca 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have never seen any pro-choicers that support pedophilia or rape in any form. I believe that you have your wired crossed and want people to believe your lies. I think that a lot of trouble in this country is caused by people like you that want to bend the truth and feed other people hate message. It seems to me that you should be ashamed of accusing people without any proof. Pro-choice people are the ones that don't want abortions put back in the backroom of warehouses where a woman and a baby has a good chance of being killed. I guess jumping on a broomstick like they did before Rowe versus Wade would suit you just fine.
2007-06-06 17:12:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by wreaser2000 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are more supporters for these two things than we'll ever want to know. There is a way to find out. Let's randomly seize the computer of 1000 Red Staters and 1000 Blue Staters and take a look at the hard drives. Might be an eye opener.
This pro abortion crowd is feisty.
2007-06-06 16:50:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Matt 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Libs don't forget courts and legs have allowed minors to have abortions without parental approval so don't say minors can not consent. There are some sick pedophiles that believe children can consent to this. So you know that some out there believe that right is there.
2007-06-06 17:51:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is generally thought that you have the right to you own body once you reach an age were you are capable of making those decisions. In most states that age is either 16 or 18. I think once you have reached the appropriate age to be able to make decisions about your body, you should be able to make all decisions. People who are below that age should be required to have a guardian of appropriate age make those decisions. This goes for sex and abortion.
Let me also add that the minor should agree with the guardian about that decision. If they don't then the default should be no action. For example, if the guardian and minor disagree about abortion, no abortion is done. If the guardian and minor disagree about sexual activity, no activity should be done.
2007-06-06 16:32:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Uhm Yes! I recently saw a young college student interviewed because she went undercover at planned parenthood in LA (research for her paper). She told them she was 15 and her 23 year old boyfriend got her pregnant. She asked about her parents being informed and they told her that she should MAKE UP a birthdate so she would be at least 16 (when parents DON'T have to be notified). Given that bit of info--you know they were not about to report the 23 year old for impregnating a 15 year old girl.
Guess what? Planned parenthood is trying to SUE HER for posting their illegal activity on the net and reporting it! I say its her body--she should be able to carry recording devices on it when ever she wants to.
2007-06-06 16:50:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'm pro choice but I certainly DO NOT support pedophilia and statutory rape. Pro choice means making informed choices about you own individual reproductive health without interference from anyone and nothing else. I really do not see the comparison here, sorry. I think you need to move on to other subjects because this is getting really stale.
2007-06-06 16:39:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by ninaol 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
I also know that homosexuals support the same sexually deviant lifestyles as pedophiles and those that practice bestiality.
Case in point - Barney Frank (D) from Massachusetts and outspoken homosexual and his relationship with NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association)
2007-06-07 01:07:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋