absolutely. and the pre-nup (although the royals call it a "marriage contract") will specify that any children of the royal marriage are the property of the sovereign, who has final say in any and all matters related to said children.
that's why diana seldom traveled with her boys after the divorce. the queen, who legally "owned" them, was unwilling to let them leave the UK.
2007-06-06 15:48:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Prince Charles did not require it of Camilla,even though Diana was awarded a very large divorce settlement...which reverted back to William and Harry at the time of her death. William and Harry may have some sort of agreement that will safeguard the Royal coffers,but treat an eventual ex-spouse fairly.But,I think both boys will be very careful and be sure that they are all ready to take the matrimonial plunge,so hopefully they won't need to use such an agreement!
2007-06-07 06:56:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sure there will be legal documents drawn up by lawyers on both sides.
When Grace Kelly married Prince Rainier of Monaco her family had to pay a $2 million dowry and yes, there were legal agreements to be signed. In addition, during the civil ceremony, which preceded the religious ceremony, it was stated that should divorce occur, the children would stay with the father.
2007-06-10 05:10:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by D 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's a good question. Who knows, I'm sure how the law works over there especially with royal couples. Didn't Diana get some money from Charles? I know she had some money on her or from her noble parents but anyway.
We know prenups are popular in Hollywood and the rest of the US but different countries have different laws.
2007-06-06 09:55:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good Question! I doubt it. Most Royal problems are usually
solved and kept private. The operative word is "private". Some like Prince Charles and Diana were not,
2007-06-07 03:31:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Alfie333 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Pre-nuptual" probably isn't the right term, but yes. When you marry someone in line for the throne, you have to agree to certain things that regular people wouldn't. For example, your claim on any joint property is limited (since much of the property "owned" by royalty isn't really considered personal property) and you renounce any right to custody of children if there's a divorce. This would apply more to William, as heir-apparent, than to Harry, but it would still be applicable.
2007-06-06 09:56:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depending up on what Prince William or Prince Harry feel about their relationship. I think we ought to give them the privacy they deserve. Why are we so interested in their lives? Nobody cares about normal citizen's like ours. So please let them live their lives.
2007-06-06 12:38:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by angelikabertrand64 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the girl will most likely be nobility but paralament with ask her to sign a prenup.
2007-06-07 02:50:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably.
2007-06-06 08:15:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
1⤊
0⤋