English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the realm of Impeachable High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

It is clear that Bush has breached all civil responsibality and caused the death of over 650,000 Iraqis.

2007-06-06 07:52:13 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

less than

2007-06-06 07:58:58 · answer #1 · answered by Gemini 5 · 1 0

I guess trying to link these two things together is typical Democrat rhetoric and a sidestep of the issue.

It is not ok for a president to seduce and have sex with one of his young interns. It is not ok for a president to commit adultery (no matter how hideous his wife is) in the oval office. And it is not ok for a president to lie to congress to cover that up. It was the lying to congress thing that started the Impeachment process.

Now, to the OTHER matter.

There is a growing belief based on old and new discoveries that under the Clinton presidency, terrorism was allowed to flourish leading to many attacks on US property. 2 embassies, a Naval ship and the twin towers.

Yet in during the Bush presidency the world has come to fear the military might of the United States and is deterred to attack.

Are you unable, or unwilling, to argue these points?

If you are able to argue these points, maybe you can win me over.

2007-06-06 15:22:01 · answer #2 · answered by Mark M 3 · 1 1

None that I know of, to the first part. Second part, it has to be more.
The third part, as to being impeachable......Clinton's impeachment, and the reasons for it, were a joke. He was rail-roaded and we all know who the engineers were. In comparing Clinton's impeachable crimes (real or imaginary) against the real record of this administration, old Bill wasn't even in the same ball park.
As to the last part ...it'll take at least 8 years of another administration to figure out all the misdeeds (and I am being kind using that term) that this bunch has perpetrated against this country and its citizens. My thanks goes out to all the uninformed voters and certain voting machines (you all know the name of them) for foisting this crowd on the rest of us.

2007-06-06 16:10:24 · answer #3 · answered by Rag Doll 5 · 0 0

Matbe instead of getting a messing around with a girl I wouldn't have touched in High School, He could have done his JOB and done something about the following Terrorists attacks that happened on his watch.

AS former Military what do I know right? but I am sure that Osama and the boys Attepted to blow up the world Center in 93, I do know They Killed 19 Airman and wounded 300 Airman in 96 at Khobar Towers, I do know, That Osama and the Boys Blew up 2 U.S. Embassy's in Africa in 98, I do know that Osama and the boys Blow a Hole in the U.S..S Cole in 2000. I do know that 3,000 Americans were killed by Osama and the Boys on 9-11, 9-11 took 6 to 8 years to plan and train who was president for 99% of that time? So If we leave and they win, and they gain strengh and more followers, there gonna come fast and hard against us, so if people want to live in a left wing nut world where everything is America's Fault, someday they may realize one morning were fighting these Terrorists for our WAY OF LIFE at least Bush is doing something about it!!!!!!! Heck CLINTON did nothing about it, expect LIE ABOUT HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH A GIRL IN WOULDN'T HAVE TOUCHED IN HIGH SCHOOL, and spent more time worrying about LYING ABOUT scandals like Whitewater, PREJURE, THAN MAYBE he would have taken Bin Laden into custody in 98 when the Sudan was willing to hand him over.

Here to help as a terrorism instructor I have probably forgotten more about Terrorism thann you kow, anytime you would like to debate Terrorism in a civil setting hit me up by e-mail.

Yeah look at your sources, try a DOD source dude.

2007-06-06 14:59:20 · answer #4 · answered by dez604 5 · 1 2

none unless he wasn't fixed.

dez needs to check his facts,he knows little about bin laden and less about Clinton.

edit. the e-mail is not open. OBL is only wanted for the embassy bombing,not the others.
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

clinton and terrorism

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.htm

also to another. G H W Bush started US involvement in the Balkan conflict and Somalia

2007-06-06 15:07:49 · answer #5 · answered by here to help 7 · 0 0

Maybe if Bill had been spending a little less time molesting the help, he could have been a little more productive in the counter-terrorism area. Especially since while he was getting his knob polished, the terrorists who perpetrated 9/11 were waltzing in and out of the country.

Ever think about that?

2007-06-06 14:58:48 · answer #6 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0 4

Clinton caused the death of hundreds of thousands of Kosovo citizens when he made us invade there.

And 11 years later we are still there.

Nice try.

2007-06-06 15:09:40 · answer #7 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 1 2

You need to count the world trade center and add up all those killed in terrorist attacks for his failure to kill Bin laden Those count and your estimate of casualties is wrong

2007-06-06 15:19:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

She was pretty much put there by someone who was very pissed off at Clinton for not barking at Israel's command

2007-06-06 15:10:17 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. USA U 2 · 1 0

Starting a war that doesn't go well is not illegal.

2007-06-06 15:16:34 · answer #10 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 0 0

hahahahaha
wow, thats funny.

hopefully someone else gets this, it took me a minute.

2007-06-06 14:55:26 · answer #11 · answered by Cara 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers