2007-06-06 05:55:04 · 27 answers · asked by superninty 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
because they are trying to do the same thing here and if their hero gets away with it, maybe they can too...
2007-06-06 05:58:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 6⤋
Best laugh of the day! At least the people want a democracy, we on the other hand allow flag burners, talk about the Nation and service personnel that try to keep the nation free of anarchy! Those that don't like it here, can See what Hugo does for you there! We tried to tell you!
2016-04-01 06:04:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't public. It was a mouthpiece of the extreme right wing in Venezuela. It's the same right wing that tried to overthrow Chavez in a coup with the help of the U.S and against the wishes of the people. That television station has been known to lie about the people and the marches in favor of Chavez. They are 100 times worse than FOX in that they actually tried to create the news and create a coup. It wasn't a free press. If it was a public t.v station, it would have had all kinds of points of view represented just like our PBS and NPR does. It was a public t.v station with only one point of view and that was of the right wing.
2007-06-06 06:01:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
By 'liberal media,' do you mean:
Fox news,
TV evangelists like Robertson or the late, unlamented Falwell,
most AM talk radio,
NY Post,
Washington Times,
Lush Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity et al
many other examples of right biased media
Much of the rest of the world regards the US media as rather conservative.
2007-06-06 06:04:04 · answer #4 · answered by mr_fartson 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'm assuming you're referring to CNN, since so many right-wingers like to claim it's got a liberal bias. If that's the case, you should know that they have already covered the closing of the TV station in Venezuela.
2007-06-06 06:00:55 · answer #5 · answered by tangerine 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hugo Chavez is a dangerous bufoon. Thinking ppl around the world are taking him seriously... In Never Never Land.
2007-06-06 06:00:10 · answer #6 · answered by Atlantic Surf 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because the Conservative (Drugged Up) Media is silent as Musharaf shuts down a public TV station. (Pakistan)
2007-06-06 05:58:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 3⤋
Do you want to promote him? That is what giving him coverage does. Not to mention I have seen stories about him on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, you name the network and I have seen it. So why is it that I can watch this but you can't? Or do you just like to spew hate...that is my guess... maybe Hugo should censor you and take away your license...
2007-06-06 06:04:26 · answer #8 · answered by bs b 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush tried to shut down PBS and NPR!
Do you se Al Jazeera in the US?
All governments control the media in some way and it's wrong no matter who does it.
2007-06-06 06:04:09 · answer #9 · answered by Incognito 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
1ST how is what Chavez doing any of our business? 2ND If the citizens have problems with how he is governing then they will take care of it. Many of you talk about not wanting a "nanny" government yet think we should be sticking our noses into what other sovereign countries are doing.
2007-06-06 06:05:08 · answer #10 · answered by gone 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
So... if... the...LIBRUL MEEDYA....ain't ...talkin'.... 'bout...it, ...how are we LIBRULS 'SPOSE to know about it...? Are you "hinting" that there MIGHT ALSO BE a non-liberal media? Or (gasp) a Conservative Media?....or would that have oxymoronic implications?
Ya see, superminty, how useless a REDUNDANT question can be?
.
2007-06-06 06:13:39 · answer #11 · answered by dreadneck 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋