Any team that has Matt Millen as a GM can go 0-16 (Lions)
2007-06-06 05:36:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Margaritavillian 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of them, the NFL is packed full of tallent and has so many games that a 12-3 team will probobly lose to the 0-15 team. Teams coast in the NFL.
2007-06-06 10:59:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Raiders, no question.
They may have added slothful WR Mike Williams, rookie QB JaMarcus Russell, flirting-with-potential QB Josh McCown, and RB Dominic Rhodes, but they still have a patchwork offensive line that allowed an eye-popping 72 sacks last season. Free agent O-line acquisition Jeremy Newberry is aging but decent, but other FA acquisitions Cooper Carlisle and Cornell Green aren't exactly Hall-ofFame-bound players. Oakland's defense is middle-of-the-pack, but their D-line is aging & they have Kansas City, San Diego and Denver in their division.
Oakland's games against Detroit (Sept. 9), Cleveland (Sept. 23) Tennessee (Oct. 28) and Houston (Nov. 4) may go a long way toward determining which team gets the 1st draft pick in 2008. But even with an easy schedule, Oakland has the best chance of going 0-16, IMHO.
2007-06-06 06:33:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dave of the Hill People 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think of its the Panthers. final 12 months became a horrid run. This 12 months could be worse. They resigned some defenders who allowed 212 extra factors then their O scored. The QB spot is finding purely as undesirable this 12 months if no longer worse. All that and that they have got the toughest schedule in 2011. Oh and the different 3 communities of their branch all won10+ video games final 12 months and that all of them 3 nevertheless look good.
2016-10-29 08:14:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Lions or Cardinals because they suck. I feel this season will be better for the Raiders because they got a new head coach and the needed a quarterback and got JaMarcus. Just because the Raiders had a bad season doesn't mean they suck, a lot of NFL teams have had bad seasons.
2007-06-06 17:21:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the Lions or the Chiefs,
and dave of the hill people you are an idiot!!!!! the Raiders defense was NUMBER 3 in the NFL last year, there d-line isnt getting older, only 3 of the seven d-line have more then 4 years experiance, they added a WR that can be productive if utilizing correctly, Rhodes should have been superbowl MVP and help carry that team through the playoffs, THey added Justin Griffith who is one of the top FB in the league, Carlisle and newbury are experiance guys, there imploying a new zone blcoking scheme into the offense and a guy like Cooper who has played almost his whole freakin carrer in that type of system can dramaticaly improve there play, they are young a talented up front and are going to improve drasticly, YOU MUST BE A PATS FAN CUZ YOU OBVIOULSY DONT KNOW FOOTBALL!!!!!!
2007-06-06 07:50:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Andrew S 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Both the Raiders and the Lions went 2-14.
Roy may be retiring. If so Lions will be alot worse.
Raiders got rid of Moss and gambling on a rookie QB.
I say theres a good chance Lions will be 0-16.
There a chance Raiders will be there I give them anywhere from 0 to 3 wins.
2007-06-06 06:33:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by thenolanater 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I really think that nobody is gonna go winless. Because of the salery cap the NFL is alot more competitive then way back. Heck even the raiders who couldnt ever put up points won 2 games. So nobody is going winless
2007-06-06 05:35:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr. D 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hate to say this, but the Kansas City Chiefs. They have a first year quarterback in Brodie Croyle. They lost Will Shields. Their defense has always been suspect. Larry Johnson is a stud, but I don't think he is going to find any running room, and I think Herm Edwards is going to work him too hard.
2007-06-06 06:50:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by troyman2000us 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
browns even though they wont becuase most teams n the nfl are getting better
2007-06-06 05:34:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by nytopa801 1
·
0⤊
0⤋