I don't want to bad mouth anyone, but what have they done to qualify them for POTUS?
2007-06-06 05:24:39 · 13 answers · asked by Fred F 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Please people just because they are a certain age and born here isn't a qualification. That's a requirement and makes them eligible. There's a difference. A big difference. Would you pick your doctor on such weak logic? I hope not.
I hear Hillary is because her husband was. Would you select your surgeon's wife to do a heart transplant on your kid because she's a wife of a doctor?
I don't care about current President, comparing them to someone else isn't a qualification. You're making the case they are lesser of two evils and that's not a qualification.
And someone copying from Hillary's web site three thousand words on her qualification isn't any help either. I can go and read fictious babel but I want qualifications. She won awards as First Lady? Wow, big deal!
Help me figure this out. I'm not slamming anyone, I just don't see why they would be qualified. I picked these two because they are the front runners right now.
2007-06-06 07:11:50 · update #1
This Space Intentionally Left Blank
2007-06-06 06:08:18 · answer #1 · answered by liberalus_destructus 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
incredibly i will inform you: - they are boht occupation politicians (Obama would be quickly) - They the two be attentive to the high quality information of ways issues function (corruptly) in Washington. - the two have been bought off via huge company and owe many favors subsequently assuring the country that no longer something would be executed FOR the persons yet many stuff would be executed for super company. - Obama is black, Hillary is a girl - neither has been a president in the previous so the belief appeals to lots of the sheeple of the USA of a. - comparable observe, Hillary is the spouse of a former president so she could desire to be elected basically for the newness of all of it - the two will lie persistently approximately doing some thing to help out right here factors: Iraq warfare, healthcare, Soc. Sec., education, the countries infrastructure, and partisian politics. Many different the two ridiculous products lead them to qualified. Neither one is clever adequate to realize they are too dumb to run the country (no longer in assessment to the various republican applicants). this could be yet another awful election the place we choose yet another fool to do no longer something for us.
2016-11-26 19:29:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What Qualifications Did Bush have he failed at everything he ever did hes an alcoholic coke head . Bush is a right wing puppet and now there even turning on him because of his comments on immigration. Are you insane ?the only reason Bush is president because of his name ,family and Karl Rove . Bad mouth ? Are you serious ?
2007-06-06 07:13:24 · answer #3 · answered by dwf77 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Check the constitution: they are natural born citizens and are of an appropriate age. The last time I looked that's all the qualifications that are necessary.
2007-06-06 05:38:33 · answer #4 · answered by Sally B 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They like every other president in the United States history had no previous experince as POTUS
2007-06-06 05:28:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Considering for the last 8 years we have heard from the liberals you have to have military service both of them don't qualify.
Running as liberal democrat senators fail last time where Bush got the majority of votes so history doesn't back them.
I guess they want to run and that is the only qualifiations to run.
The one who refer to the dead in Iraq as wasted lives should be pull from the ticket.
Or how they both use fake accents depending on who they talk to at the time doesn't help their case.
2007-06-06 05:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course, you aren't trying to bad-mouth them. (wink-wink) But anyway, they have reached the Constitutionally required age of 35 and they were born in America. Which, COINCIDENTALLY are the same QUALIFICATIONS of any other citizen-politician desirous of that job. Amazing, huh?
.
2007-06-06 05:55:27 · answer #7 · answered by dreadneck 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lets do a little compare and contrast with the sitting president.
both are smarter, better spoken, more articulate, better able to think on their feet and both appear to be more honest and genuine than our current president.
either will be a breath of fresh air compared with our nitwit-in-chief...
2007-06-06 05:28:51 · answer #8 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well, since obama can't tell us, how do you expect me to?
hillary was at least married to a president for many years, so at least she knows what they do
(doesnt mean i think she's the one)
2007-06-06 05:36:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
served well in the U S senate
2007-06-06 05:27:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋