2007-06-06 05:04:45 · 15 answers · asked by PLUTO 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I like your question, Pluto.
Poverty and Ignorance are immortal and adaptable.
The income level that would have been considered "poverty" 200 years ago is now wiped out. But poverty is not dead, the standard is just different, or he has simply moved to a new location.
Likewise, Ignorance could never be killed. First, some people seem to enjoy keeping it as a pet. Second, the standard would again be movable. 200 years ago, treatment of other races or religions as inferior would not have been considered "ignorant", and now it is.
Besides, I wouldn't want to mess with Poverty or Ignorance. I'd be afraid that their friends, Pestilence and Hatred would come looking for me...
2007-06-07 00:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by Ms Informed 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The answer is.. NO
Instead, I think I would befriend Poverty and make him my best best friend. Why? because with Poverty around, I wouldn't be alone again while all the rich men are busy amassing wealth to keep me company.
And Ignorance, I would live in the same house with him all the days of my life because in the house with Ignorance, there would be no mirror in which to view my lapses in judgement.
2007-06-07 20:06:28 · answer #2 · answered by katrina_ponti 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Ignorance, no. I live with ignorance..ignorance is my whole life. I'm just like that.
But I mean, you are aware of the food web, right? If one part of the web disappears, then the web is disrupted. Like if poverty and ignorance were prey of...parrots, then the population of parrots would decrease...you know what I mean.
I think we should just lock the creatures up and tame them.
2007-06-06 12:29:18 · answer #3 · answered by Banana Hero [sic] 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The judgment of ignorance comes from a place of arrogance. Anyone who is arrogant can be demonstrated to be lacking in intelligence.
Poverty is often a choice. Much of the world chooses to keep their future generations in poverty through their choices.
Killing ignorance or poverty would be self-serving.
2007-06-06 05:16:26 · answer #4 · answered by guru 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i believe poverty is not the best thing to learn from.so, i would squeeze it, squash it, step on it, i would destroy every bit of it, make sure there is no element of life in it.i would personally kill it!
but for ignorance, i would enclose it the archives. i would spear it for the future generations, to learn from it. as a matter of fact it is one of the factors that creates poverty. it uld be useless being dead, it would rather exist and help us shape our lives!
oh! n i adore u.
2007-06-06 21:32:36 · answer #5 · answered by scholar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You would require Heavy Golden Stakes, driven perfectly through their hearts, to kill the immortal vampires. ... Otherwise, you'll just be another phony political dragon-slayer running for office.
2007-06-07 01:32:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No because all the creatures have a purpose even the bad ones . .
2007-06-06 05:10:18 · answer #7 · answered by Rainy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
An instant answer? enable each and all the Nukes fly, blowing up each sq. kilometer of land. it would certainly take around 25 minutes, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it would sparkling up ALL of humanity's problems.
2017-01-10 16:16:42 · answer #8 · answered by helfer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not kill them, I would capture them and observe them for sure of an infestation. I would learn of them, and learn how to kill them. I would teach the world, and not charge for extermination. That is what I would do.
2007-06-06 05:12:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would or could? Anthropomorphisms may not be as easy to kill if their root concepts are dependant on offsetting concepts.
2007-06-06 06:42:42 · answer #10 · answered by ycats 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋