English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

other permanently . As the group being eliminated you have the power to strike back but doing so means the end of humanity with no survivors . Do you launch a retaliatory strike or not .

2007-06-06 02:06:18 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Your premise is flawed. Even in all out nuclear war some humans would survive. We are the weeds of the animal world. Spread througout the globe with a strong sense for survival and the intelligence to adapt quickly.

2007-06-06 02:21:47 · answer #1 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 0 0

Impossible situation to occur, as everyone knows there is three sides to every story, 1. the Left spin. 2. The Right spin. 3. The Truth. So, in essence yes, launch the retaliatory strike which will finally remove ALL the bloody whingers of the world (republicans & democrats) and leave the third group alive, because they're the only people who actually know what the hell is going on!!
THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A THIRD GROUP IN EVERY SITUATION......UNLESS HUMANS ARE SO STUPID THAT THEY BELIEVE ONLY IN TWO SIDES TO EVERYTHING!!!

2007-06-06 09:20:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That depends.

If the Republicans were actually Conservatives and the Democrats were actually Noe-Socialist Liberals, I'd defend myself by all means possible. Since Liberals have already declared war on America, I'd consider that sufficient cause to eliminate them.

Now...If, The Democrats were actually like our Southern citizens like the Blue Dogs who are Socially Liberal (in the true sense of the word) and fiscally Conservative ---> then I'd shake their hand and wish us all well.

Bottom Line: Neo-Socialists are attempting to destroy America from within. This world doesn't need another USSR. One failure is enough.

2007-06-06 09:25:44 · answer #3 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0 1

The democrats would never launch such an attack, nor would they respond if attacked. We must, then, assume that the republicans attacked. Therefore, you are placing me in the position of being a democrat which I refuse to be. The good news is that only republicans are left!

2007-06-06 09:23:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would probably be an outcast, I would probably not be a member of either group. I am sure there would be others like me too. We would just sit back and let the haters kill each other instead of trying to work together. We would own the world after that.

2007-06-06 09:11:26 · answer #5 · answered by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4 · 3 0

How can a group that has been "ended" permanently strike back?

2007-06-06 09:11:07 · answer #6 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 2 0

Zee Hat Man is Zee Nutcase of da week for "Liberals declare war on America" BS.

To answer: I probably would. Its hard to answer that question at face value, but I probably would.

2007-06-06 12:35:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course we launch the strike; we are humans and we love a good fight.

2007-06-06 09:09:43 · answer #8 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 0 2

Bad analogy, but yes better none, left to tell the tale

2007-06-06 09:11:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I like your thought process. I would be fearful of what I left behind, but killing for what purpose? Senseless killing never makes sense.

2007-06-06 09:11:59 · answer #10 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers