I mean....ALL of the viewer polls that I have seen have Ron Paul in at least second place...but yet...all they talk about are those three.
The talking heads on TV really ARE against him aren't they!!
2007-06-06 01:22:15 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Quite simply, Ron Paul hasn't been bought by soft-money. It is this corporate money that is supporting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. McCain, Guiliani and Romney will continue the corporate agenda for the Middle East. Ron Paul by all accounts is unpredictable. His position questions the legitimacy of the war with regards to the 9/11 pretext that put us there. Also, Ron Paul has questioned the constitutionality of the privately owned Federal Reserve which funds these international schemes. Ron Paul is indeed dangerous to these "banksters" and globalists.
2007-06-06 01:38:56 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 8⤊ 1⤋
In reply to Fish who said: "RP is pro abortion, anti gun, anti religion, not just anti-Xian, anti all religion. RP is a democrat."
About all I can say is that you should do your homework before you go spouting out things that you obviously know nothing about. You couldn't be more wrong about Ron Paul's positions if you tried. It is an uneducated viewpoint such as yours that keeps getting us people like Clinton and Bush as President.
2007-06-06 10:13:57 · answer #2 · answered by Chris S 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because those three are the ones with the most money. I thought Paul did a great job last night also. If I were going to vote for a Republican, it would be him.
2007-06-06 09:52:34 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
He's not part of the established party...it's about getting someone elected...the party has a machine that helps to control publicity...and make no mistake the news organizations are part of that machine...who do you think buys all the ad time?
2007-06-06 08:31:38 · answer #4 · answered by Jake1234 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The establishment media and the Republican party has pre-determined that McCain, Giuliani and Romney are the really electable candidates and that Paul is a "fringe" candidate not to be taken seriously.
2007-06-06 08:35:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Visibility and money. Plus our Tse Tse Fly attention span.
2007-06-06 13:41:04 · answer #6 · answered by Pask 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i will never vote for those assholes!!!
everyone shoudl write in mainstream and demand they stop declaring winners that have not WON. they are the worst!!
Ron Paul Revolution!!
2007-06-06 16:18:33 · answer #7 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I had a Ron Paul supporter tell me it was rigged.
I don't think Ron Paul has a real chance.
2007-06-06 08:33:39 · answer #8 · answered by just a mom 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Because the top tier is already bought and paid for by the big money campaign contributers. Corporate corruption is running this country and we need to stop it NOW.
2007-06-06 08:32:59 · answer #9 · answered by Enigma 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋
"taking heads" indeed
Give the little guy a chance and look how he will prove himself.
Big three are full of sh**.
2007-06-06 21:17:54 · answer #10 · answered by It's me, Kassy. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋