If he was president it would be most interesting to see how he handles the jews involvement with Lebanon! Absolutely, he should have been president generations ago!
2007-06-06 01:00:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nader is a shill checkout RON PAUL
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul's Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Advocates a limited role for the federal government, low taxes, free markets, a non-interventionist foreign policy, and a return to monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency.
"We have lost our way and strayed from the free society our founders secured from us in the constitution" - Ron Paul.
2007-06-06 07:40:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by RON PAUL for President 2008 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO!!
This guy was so smart that he didnt withdraw from the race in 2000 just to make a point that the minority party was important. End result: Bush got to be president. (unless you think the greens would have voted republican, after even Nader 'endorsed' Gore after the whole thing was over)
2007-06-06 07:25:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by A C 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
No. Ron Paul!!!! He is the only one who cares about the constitution and sorting out the mess in Iraq.
www.ronpaul2008.com
2007-06-06 07:43:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ivor Hugh G.Rection 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. Nader would never make it.
2007-06-06 07:25:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Absolutely not.
2007-06-06 07:23:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Charles C 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
no, but Raphael Nadal should be
2007-06-06 08:02:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
2007-06-06 07:25:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
no
2007-06-06 07:21:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by jean 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
NO!!!!
2007-06-07 05:55:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by robert x 7
·
0⤊
1⤋