Not for a minute do I believe Oswald acted alone. The real evidence proves that he couldn't have been the only shooter. And the fact that the Warren report stayed sealed for so long, implies a major cover up. I am of the opinion that vp LBJ had knowledge...
2007-06-06 00:50:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~RedBird~ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not a chance. He was merely the "patsy." And there were at least three shooters on that fateful day in Dallas, with some shots from the front and back, in a solid "crossfire" pattern. Please study the evidence and become educated in this field....and take care, as there is a huge amount of disinformation extant today. One of the best sources is "JFK and the Unspeakable" by Hughes. Another is Mark Lane's "Rush to Judgement." Also, "High Treason" by Livingstone and Groden. These three are pure gold. The two worst in the field--absolute trash--are "Case Closed" by Posner, and "History Reconsidered" by Bugliosi. "Dark Camelot" is also dark, tabloid junk...for the most part. Incidentally, forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht, M.D., calls the the Warren Report a "fairy-tale" and the assassination a military coup d'etat. Right on, Dr. Wecht!!
2013-11-25 20:18:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mickey Finn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never believed that Oswald acted alone and now we hear that E.Howard Hunt, confessed on his death bed that he was involved in the conspiracy with Lyndon Johnson being the ring leader to the assassination of Kennedy. Supposedly there was a hired assassin from France who also shot from the grassy knoll. Oswald was the distracter, but he also was a shooter. A book is being released about this from Hunt's son. Officials are already trying to debunk it all as ramblings of an old man or that his son is just trying to cash in on his fathers notoriey, and he was an x-addict of drugs and that he can't be trusted. I'm not so sure. I had thought all these years in that direction myself about the conspiracy and perhaps Johnson's part in it. I intend to read the book.I wonder, will we ever know 100%?
2007-06-06 04:24:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by BoosGrammy 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Conspiracy. There is no way a qualified markeman in 1000 could have hit Kennedy from that window using that cheap bolt action rifle equipped with a cheap scope with poor eye relief.
You ever fire a GOOD bolt-action rifle with a scope at a moving target ?
at a moving target - also the Zapruder film shows Kennedy hit from the FRONT. My guess: Rogue CIA, with Cubans and mafia pulled this off.
I never believed the 27 volume Warren Commission report. White wash all of it.
2007-06-06 00:25:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am conservative, but even I dont believe that Oswald acted alone. I believe he was a scapegoat. Not innocent but he was hung out to dry so to speak.
2007-06-06 00:18:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
He may have pulled the trigger, but there are suggestions that the mob was behind the whole thing.
Click the link below, then cursor down for a video of author Gore Vidal as he recounts personal experiences and memories regarding this issue.
2007-06-06 00:49:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We'll never have the full story.
Jack Ruby didn't shoot Oswald because he was angry about JFK being shot.
2007-06-06 00:27:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by flushles 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
The shot has been duplicated. Still I think it was allowed to happen if not set up because of Kennedy's drug use and the North Woods Plan. He was becoming very dangerous to his own country.
2007-06-06 00:48:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oswald was just a loser set up to divert attention from the FBI assassin.
2007-06-06 00:09:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Crocodile Jim 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe he was one of them but didn't do it alone. I also believe that someone in politics knew this was going to happen and it was a set up from the beginning.
2007-06-06 00:09:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Blackhorse7274 2
·
1⤊
1⤋