Why would parents guilty of "something fishy" point fingers at themselves???

Question

OK, this is not about the McCanns leaving their babies unattended.
That was inexusable & they (worse for them, their Madeleine is) paying the terrible price for it.
With that out of the way, i'd like to raise the other angle that some of our wiseguys
love to point to...That there is "something fishy" going on, that Madeleine's parents
have some deep dark sinister secret (other than leaving their babies alone) to hide,
maybe they've sold her (???), maybe there was a horrible "accident" & trash like that.

IF, they did, will someone please tell me why Gerry McCann writes such a boring blog
& doesn't get all weepy & waily to increase his sympathisers & get the heat off him?
Why are they taking the trouble to keep the case alive & fresh, instead of sobbing
crocodile tears & lying low (anyone would understand & forgive them that...)
Why are they leaving their twins (knowing the flak they'll get for it) just to
ensure that Madeleine's case gets more coverage?
I'm confused. Surely 2 parents guilty of a sinister crime against their own baby
wouldn't point fingers to themselves...
OR maybe they made a horrible terrible decision & are now doing the best
they can to right it (to get their baby back) based on the advice given by experts
(who do know more about such cases than any of our YA wiseguys)...

Anyone who would like to answer this, please do so within 20minutes...
i've found that my innocent little posts are being reported & taken off
despite not being the least bit abusive...Real healthy mature attitude...

Answer 1

http://www.petitiononline.com/June2007/petition.html

Answer 2

I want to refer to a TV program called FBI Files. They explain how crimes got solved by police and FBI. there was a case where a baby disappeared from home. The mother said a man hit her on the head when she was taken the trash out, then she was unconcious and the man stole the baby. Police first thought that babys disappearing at home is something very rare. they looked for her, days later the body of the baby appeared in a close rubbish bin. At the end they found out who the killer was thanks to forensic science and luck. the killer was the MOTHER. In addition, they knew that another baby from this parents appeared dead close to their house but because animal had eaten her (the baby) , police could not say if she had been murdered and the investigation concluded. Good news is that at the end that mother got cought.
Let's hope the innocent portuguese police starts investigating this british parents.

Answer 3

I have considered this exact point to myself. I dont know the answer. Maybe as a double bluff?
I am not saying they are involved. But I cant help that niggly feeling that they werent honest at the start of the investigation, and why not???
Why didnt they say exactly the times they checked on the little ones?

Answer 4

Fortunately the police are not swayed by public opinion, I hope. If there is anything fishy, let them look into it. It's what they are paid for.
This shouldn't be a trial by internet. Whatever happened to "innocent until proved guilty"?

Answer 5

plain and simple because it would look twice as fishy if they didnt keep it up.

especially when there are so many gullible people not daring to question it all