Would lowering welfare rates help to curb poverty through economic incentives?

Answer 1

Interesting question - I am positive you will get answers where people think we have to take care of the poor or that everyone in this country deserves to make as much as the next guy....most of those type of answers are a bunch of crappola. I will prove it to you - for everyone who says that - I am a poor man living a simple life - I want you to send me all your money - put your money where your mouth (or in this case yoru fingers) is. If there are any takers Iwill gladly accpet your donations for I can surely find some real good use for them.

On the other side of the coin you will have the people against it because they feel that if you just give away welfare the people will buy booze or drugs.....maybe they do - I dont know - I dont follow them - its still the wrong reason none the less.

So lets look at the cause (lowering welfare rates) and see some real effect. If we lowered to the rates 9lets go to the extreme) to zero what would happen?

1. less taxes removed from wages since we dont have to support welfare any longer - this means that the average person has more money in their pocket - thats a good thing isnt it?

2. people wont have handouts any longer - that means they will be required to get off their batutie and do some real work...this means that they are actually becoming an integral part of the local economy....thats a good thing isnt it?

3. people will need to be responsible for their actions, if they want to buy something they will have to pay for it with their own money...they will not just throw their money out on designer clothes ...they will actually take theri time to think about what they need and save the rest..thats a good thing isnt it?

Hmmmmm, for the life of me I cant think of a single bad thing to be associated with lower the welfare rate to zero...why havent we done this yet? Oh yeah, I forgot, we have idiots in office who think they know how to live our lives better then we do and wont leave us alone. Get rid of the reps and dems - put in a libertarian minded person..maybe we can still save this country.

Answer 2

Lowering warfare rates would cause some of the people on welfare to work , or work more, so it would decrease the number of people who earned less than the poverty level. However since welfare is designed to support people who for some reason can not work, or earn enough by work, most people could not increase their work efforts , so they would see their income decline and the lower rate would increase the actual number of people living in poverty.

Answer 3

Honestly minimum wage should be well over 10 dollars an hour.How can anyone survive on such low wages.I understand that certain jobs are harder than others however not everyone has the money or intelligence for the education required for 6 figure plus jobs and i don't feel they should be punished for it.NO ONE in this country should be hungry or homeless!!

Answer 4

Likely.

Answer 5

I just wanted to say, I have yet to encounter someone dumber online than 3 and out. Does this moron even listen to what he's saying? Sorry about not actually answering your question

Answer 6

They define poverty in a distinctive way than u.s. of u.s. does, for starters. i might prefer to comprehend why those in poverty contained in u.s. of u.s. have an obesity situation, have the main up-tp-date iPhones and extra effective wellbeing care than I do.