http://news.yahoo.com/photo/070604/photos_sp_wl_afp/8304c847f56d46ca14d8a9ad11d3275a;_ylt=AsIYdpybzUXj151g1Fk8ZUDGOrgF
It's like some great craptastic jumble of blocks. Although..it looks like the Jumble on the right side, is blowing the jumble on the left?
2007-06-04 19:51:54 · 7 answers · asked by psayre33 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
its supposed to be the logo for the 2012 olympic games, its hiddeous it looks like a broken swastica, which is disrespectful to those that suffered during the war at the hands of the nazi's. it should be scrapped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-08 02:57:25 · answer #1 · answered by stormchaser 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Show respect! That mess cost at least £400,000!
(Some sources, £500,000)
Yes "Lisa Simpson giving head" has been suggested elsewhere, so although it's unthinkable it's not unthinkable.
What on earth did the candidate logos they *rejected* look like?
2007-06-04 20:09:01 · answer #2 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't suppose to be the new logo for the 2112 Olympic Games. It is absolutely ugly.
2007-06-04 23:27:52 · answer #3 · answered by CT 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's some wicked design. May be it's designed by British dentists. Looks like Britain's teethes. Jagged and ugly.
2007-06-04 19:59:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A wrecked ketchup train
2007-06-05 04:40:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is the numbers 2012, the year they are hosting
2007-06-04 20:02:47 · answer #6 · answered by bigfurness 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it looks like a jigsaw that won't fit together.
2007-06-04 22:17:45 · answer #7 · answered by missy k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋