Like on tonight's RAW, there was a tag-team rematch then Cena and Khali met again though it was a triple threat. Give the PPV wrestlers the night off and stick in the mid-carders. Steven Richards and Funaki need face time!
2007-06-04 18:58:51 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
i don´t get ppv any more, i use to when i had the money, but here lately, like in the past few years, no time nor the money for them. I just watch what i can when i can
Wrestling is Cool
2007-06-12 08:46:25 · answer #1 · answered by Bugs Bunny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's even worse is they did Cena v. Khali at SNME, the night before the PPV. WWE's been pretty stupid about booking lately, but so has TNA. TNA's given away a lot of first time dream matches on cable TV when they could easily help the PPV buy revenue.
HAHAHAHA, as much as I am a fan of both Big Stevie Cool and Sho Funaki, they are not midcarders, they're curtain jerking jobbers. Stevie's had one good match this year against CM Punk, and that's the last I expect to see of him for the next six months or so, that is if Steph doesn't get that itch in her nethers to fire both him and "Smackdown's Number One Backstage Reporter." I do agree on this point though, they need to push the midcard. Guys like Nitro, Dykstra, and Chavo are going to waste in mismatched tag teams and dark matches. I would've added Helms to the list, but he's getting the ever-popular neck fuse done to prevent further injury, and I bet most people didn't even know that since the guy's been on a card once since Mania, and even at Mania he was in a dark match.
2007-06-05 00:29:57 · answer #2 · answered by Candle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love it.. The night after the PPV's are always the best RAW's of the year. You get the PPV results and some damn fine rematches.. heck the titles changed hands on the tag belts tonight, and in the past even the heavyweight title changed in a rematch.
It's awesome.
Usually after the PPV you also see the birth of all the new feuds for the next month or two.
2007-06-04 20:58:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't think of any PPV in the last few years that was worth the money. That's why my friends and I go to watch it at the bar for $2.
2007-06-04 19:07:11 · answer #4 · answered by S4M F1SHER 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't hate it, but only because I won't waste my money on PPVs. I want Vince McMahon to go out of business, so it would be counterproductive to give him money. As for TNA, I would like to see their PPVs, but I always have more important things to spend my money on then wrestling shows.
2007-06-04 21:35:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's one of the reasons I stopped buying WWE ppv. As far as Richards, Funaki, et al. No; they don't.
2007-06-04 19:04:29 · answer #6 · answered by everybody loves 3000 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its pointless because people blow £15 on ppv's when they can watch the same match later that week
2007-06-04 22:58:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is horrible that the WWE has no respect for the paying fan.They give them basicly the same match as the world gets to see the next day.
2007-06-12 06:29:40 · answer #8 · answered by terry v 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a Dusty Rhodes trademark. He is the lead booker for the WWE right now. He is notorious for doing this.
2007-06-04 19:05:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
tricky thing. browse on google or bing. that will can assist!
2014-12-06 15:23:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋