English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm not here to b*tch around over what show is better, I'm just explaining why TNA has better wrestling.

You see, unlike WWE, TNA never holds back their superstars and that's why you see more wrestling in TNA.

In WWE however, they hold back most of their great superstars like Benoit and Shelton Benjamin. Then, you got some guy like cena, who has 4 moves and makes wrestling look so fake but is like the Superman of WWE.

Agree or Disagree?

2007-06-04 15:54:40 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

14 answers

cause TNA doesn't have supermans aka lashely and cena or batista

They might not have good story lines but they have great wrestlers
Christian Cage
A.J Styles
Sting
Kurt Angle
Jeff Jarett

and tna at least their belts change hands. I predicting Angle wins King of the mountain.

Christian Cage vs Kurt Angle

I really started hating cena when he fued with Y2J and beat him all the time. Then it was Kurt Angle then Edge then HHH and the list goes on. Them wrestlers are so much better than Cena.

The thing that really gets me is they have a guy like Satino have the I.C title instead of Shelton or Nitro. I rather see Shelton and Nitro in a main event than cena or lashley

2007-06-04 16:19:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with you. The reason TNA is far superior is that they don't have Vince McMahon and Stephanie McMahon-Levesque holding back wrestlers and promoting within their clique. Also, TNA is more about athleticism than entertainment. I would like to see how many of the WWE could compete in an Ultimate X match in TNA. I'm guessing not many. Even though TNA plays politics probably they don't completely kill a wrestler's career if they disagree with Jeff Jarrett and Dixie Carter.

2007-06-04 16:03:52 · answer #2 · answered by SteboSTC 4 · 1 0

disagree.
you said in your question "tna's wrestling" but judging by your examples i think you mean their creative team.
you claim that wwe holds back their superstars, but their is always so much more involved then just "holding them back coz they can". while he is obviously a fantastic pure athlete, shelton is held back because of his unwillingness to learn and has poor mic skills. benoit has his push as world champion back in 04. saying that he has been held back is like saying that he hasnt been given the opportunity to show the world what hes made of. benoit was pwis wrestler of the year in 2004, won the royal rumble, won the world title in the main event at mania, and held the title until summerslam, while defeating huge superstars like shawn michaels and triple h. he isnt been used much these days because one of the smackdown writers doesnt believe he has the mic skills nor the charisma to make it to the main event level again, though im told hes moving to raw in the upcoming draft, so that could change.
i do will agree with your comments on cena, but he is only one guy. lets not forget edge, who IS deserving of the treatment he has been given, and if he continues down the path he is going, will soon be considered as wwe's (for lack of a better term) superman, not just smackdowns.

2007-06-05 00:01:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to declare that types is extra effectual than Cena and Orton mixed is a stretch evaluate Orton's history. I agree that WWE has no real tag-communities so i'm going to provide you that one. yet in time Hart Dynasty would be a large team. Beth, Melina or perhaps Michelle are precise Divas in WWE and that i could take them over Knockout anyday. you incredibly think of appealing people can wrestle??? WWE will continually have a bigger aim audience by using call WWE/WWF; TNA could quite desire to get a million//2 of WWE's aim audience!

2016-11-25 23:35:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Agree TNA does put on better matches with alot of indpendent wrestlers not getting a better shot and
International wrestlers joining the show makes alot
more interesting but remember Vince has said it many
times like the famous phone call he got from Ted Turner.
"Hey Vince I'm in the rassling business now and Vince said
"that nice Ted but I'm in the entertainment business".
That's really what he's into now just the money.

2007-06-04 16:08:48 · answer #5 · answered by Max Powers 2 · 0 0

Disagree TNA does not even have enough confidence in their stars like Samoa Joe or Styles to give them the belt. But they use guys like Sting Cage and and Angle to take the belt. Think about it all the guys getting pushed were all made in a different promotion. While Joe their best star bar none has been held back all year

2007-06-04 16:12:50 · answer #6 · answered by King of Kings fan 5 · 0 0

you said "Then, you got some guy like cena, who has 4 moves and makes wrestling look so fake but is like the Superman of WWE." I say. IT IS fake. how could he not make it look fake?

I want you wwe fans to realize how much hard work REAL wrestlers put into wrestling. I'm talking about folkstyle and freestyle wrestling. You know, real wrestling. WWE stars just need to look tough and be good actors.

2007-06-04 16:03:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well I watch both shows and I think it cause the founder of TNA(Jeff Jarent) believe in staying with roots, and vince is more about making money( I think people just need to give tna chance if they say their wrestler are to old, well alot of them are around hhh age, so his he to old?)

2007-06-04 16:13:30 · answer #8 · answered by wild chick 2 · 0 0

Like I've said b4, TNA has superior in ring action but WWE has better story lines.

2007-06-04 15:58:20 · answer #9 · answered by HULK RULES!! 7 · 1 0

TNA is my favorite wrestling franchise.

It is fast paced, and never the same twice.

People can wrestle, for one, and there aren't stupid stories getting in the way of the action. There aren't any supermen in TNA, either.

2007-06-04 16:11:50 · answer #10 · answered by Darrion_Hardy321 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers